-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0938-22 CHRISTOPHER BARNES, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Ocean County, Docket No. FM-15-0866-20. … defendant to enroll the child in a pre-K program in the school district where defendant resides; (6) considering the …
-
njcourts.gov
… with defendant Residence Parameters: 1. Does the defendant have a stable residence/address where he/she will remain for … to live at the residence? ☐ Yes ☐ No 6. Will the defendant have access to an electrical outlet to charge the unit? ☐ … court ordered Temporary or Final Restraining Order, any Division of Child Protection and Permanency orders/agreements, …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … originally sued only Carriage and unknown Carriage employees alleging various LAD violations and common-law … In these circumstances and in the interests of justice, we have determined to consider the merits of this appeal …
-
njcourts.gov
… JUDGE JESSICA R. MAYEr SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY : LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. MID L-00IIII-07-MT CIVIL …
-
njcourts.gov
… Waters, Sr., SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, LAW DIVISION MIDDLESEX COUNTY Docket No, MID L -007724-08 MT v, … Gayle Atkins, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, LAW DIVISION MIDDLESEX COUNTY Docket No. MID L-00872 I -08 MT v. … J. Edwards, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, LAW DIVISION MIDDLESEX COUNTY Docket No. MID L-008738-08 MT v. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4107-18T3 IN THE MATTER OF STATE OF NEW … of appeal listed only the February 28 order, and should have included the reconsideration decision. Because SFTA … barred arbitration were not applicable to State trooper employees because they fall within an unclassified service. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1138-15T1 RICHARD WILLIAMS, EDDIE BROWN, … that the employer did not treat similarly situated employees equally. Id. at 304. The ultimate burden of … discipline should be a starting line. Our courts have adopted the burden-shifting framework articulated in …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1138-15T1 RICHARD WILLIAMS, EDDIE BROWN, … that the employer did not treat similarly situated employees equally. Id. at 304. The ultimate burden of … discipline should be a starting line. Our courts have adopted the burden-shifting framework articulated in …
njcourts.gov
… own safety and in a manner that the public entity ought to have reasonably foreseen or expected from people who would … — that is, [plaintiff] need not prove that someone would have suffered an injury exactly at the time and in the … it had notice in sufficient time prior to the injury to have corrected the condition. a. The public entity is …
-
7.21
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… was contributory negligent, you will apply the following provision of 46 U.S.C.A., Sec. 688 commonly referred to as the … right or remedy in cases of personal injury to railway employees shall apply, and in case of the death of any … to this case provides that the fact that the seaman may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2342-21 STREET 13 LLC, … sale following remand, to the extent the application would have been successful. Now, he can not identify any legal or … third-party purchaser, who has paid all property taxes and insurance as the title owner since 2020, is immense. We are …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4142-15T1 THOMAS HAWKINS, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. L-2658-15. Ronald A. … defendants. 3 A-4142-15T1 Plaintiff argues the judge should have permitted jurisdictional discovery before dismissing …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4142-15T1 THOMAS HAWKINS, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. L-2658-15. Ronald A. … defendants. 3 A-4142-15T1 Plaintiff argues the judge should have permitted jurisdictional discovery before dismissing …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2342-21 STREET 13 LLC, … sale following remand, to the extent the application would have been successful. Now, he can not identify any legal or … third-party purchaser, who has paid all property taxes and insurance as the title owner since 2020, is immense. We are …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … Ferreira requested defendant's license, registration, and insurance; but defendant, appearing very nervous, was unable … court's 'opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5076-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Y. TINEO-PAULINO, Defendant, and FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Surety-Respondent, and BLAZE BAIL BONDS, … THE COURT WITHIN[] FOUR YEARS AFTER THE RECOGNIZANCE SHALL HAVE BEEN DECLARED FORFEITED, N.J.S.A. 2A:162-8. POINT V THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5076-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Y. TINEO-PAULINO, Defendant, and FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Surety-Respondent, and BLAZE BAIL BONDS, … THE COURT WITHIN[] FOUR YEARS AFTER THE RECOGNIZANCE SHALL HAVE BEEN DECLARED FORFEITED, N.J.S.A. 2A:162-8. POINT V THE …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0519-22 ROBERT MONTGOMERY, … 6 A-0519-22 of his termination quickly spread" amongst ACE employees, who "knew that his termination involved . . . … an improper credibility determination that he could not have a reasonable belief that stealing time was unlawful or …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0519-22 ROBERT MONTGOMERY, … 6 A-0519-22 of his termination quickly spread" amongst ACE employees, who "knew that his termination involved . . . … an improper credibility determination that he could not have a reasonable belief that stealing time was unlawful or …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2468-15T2 MAXINE DIAKOS, Individually … business, but are not being paid back from the business, have been paid back to each of them. In the event there is … for the waitresses. Under both Federal and New Jersey law, employees who work "in a bona fide executive, …