-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … days of loss of commutation time. On appeal, Square argues: POINT I APPELLANT'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS, AS SET FORTH IN … to disturb the DOC's finding of guilt. Affirmed. … a3937-18.pdf … A-3937-18T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … challenges the denial of his PCR petition on two grounds: POINT I – DEFENDANT'S PCR PETITION SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN … conclusions reached by Judge Kirsch. Affirmed. … a1355-19.pdf … A-1355-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… (Howard A. Bachman, of counsel and on the brief; Lauren Conway, on the brief). Respondent has not filed a brief. PER … add only a few brief comments. In rejecting Jack's first point, we agree that the judge did not express a definitive … what had already admittedly occurred. Affirmed. … a4128-19.pdf … A-4128-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … hearing, and raises the following arguments in his brief: POINT I DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a5431-14.pdf … A-5431-14T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… State of New Jersey Combined Standard Terms and Conditions (Revised June 3, 2025) 1.0 STANDARD TERMS AND … tp://www.state.nj.us/treasury/purchase/forms/eo134/Chapter51.pdf. 2.9 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE The Contractor is … tp://www.state.nj.us/treasury/purchase/forms/eo134/Chapter51.pdf http://www.elec.state.nj.us/ F. The provisions cited …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … prison term. Defendant appealed and argued the following points: I. THE CSAAS TESTIMONY OF DR. TASKA WAS … defendant's conviction and sentence. Affirmed. … a6236-12r.pdf … A-6236-12T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … followed. On appeal, defendant presents the following points for our consideration: POINT I BECAUSE DEFENDANT MET … v. Marshall, 148 N.J. 89, 158 (1997). Affirmed. … a3866-23.pdf … A-3866-23 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CLARENCE W. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appellant raises the following arguments in his brief: POINT I THE PAROLE [BOARD] DENYING PLAINTIFF PAROLE BECAUSE … opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(D) and (E). Affirmed. … a0663-23.pdf … A-0663-23 – WILLIAM NEELD VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … it is, best interest. So what the argument is that at this point I should decide that, point one, to see if it's … the proceedings is without merit. Affirmed. … a0159-15.pdf … A-0159-15T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … on two children. Defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT J.C. RECEIVED … See Preciose, 129 N.J. at 462-63. Affirmed. … a1220-17.pdf … A-1220-17T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 27, 2018 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New … raises the following contentions for our consideration: POINT I: THERE REMAINS A FACTUAL QUESTION OF WHETHER CFM HAD … written opinion. R. 2:11- 3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a4769-16.pdf … A-4769-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presents the following issues for our consideration . POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING [DEFENDANT'S] … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a2190-20.pdf … A-2190-20 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RASHEED DILLAHUNT …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … October 31, 2019. He raises the following issues on appeal. POINT I ALL OF DEFENDANT'S STATEMENTS AT THE SCENE OF HIS … the conviction and the sentence. Affirmed. … a1331-19.pdf … A-1331-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following point headings for our consideration: POINT I: THE TRIAL … entered on this date. 9 A-2424-18T1 Affirmed. … a2424-18.pdf … A-2424-18T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … his convictions and sentence. He presents the following points of argument: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE … otherwise unsupported by the record. Affirmed. … a0547-17.pdf … A-0547-17T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, along the nineteen access points. In December 2012, the Borough Council presented its … judgment was appropriately granted. Affirmed. … a0154-18.pdf … A-0154-18T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … judgment of conviction, raising the following single point for our consideration: BECAUSE THE COURT ERRED IN … further discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a2538-18.pdf … A-2538-18T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … raises the following issues for our consideration: POINT I THE STATE FAILED TO PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT … (citing Midler, 10 N.J. at 128–29). Affirmed. … a3727-18.pdf … A-3727-18T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … remand to decide the matter on the merits. 6 A-2252-17T3 POINT I AS THE PCR COURT MISAPPREHENDED PETITIONER'S CLAIM, … (adopting the Strickland standard). Affirmed. … a2252-17.pdf … A-2252-17T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … This appeal followed, with defendant raising the following points of argument: POINT I IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, … a relaxation of the procedural bar. Affirmed. … a5724-17.pdf … A-5724-17T3 …