Filters
- A-3241-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… the trial judge determined, plaintiff's complaint alleged violations of the NJCRA under the state-created-danger …
- 5.51A Charges Document PDFnjcourts.govCHARGE 5.51A ― Page 1 of 10 5.51A LEGAL MALPRACTICE (Approved 06/1979; Revised 10/2022) NOTE TO JUDGE The elements of a legal malpractice action are “(1) the existence of an attorney-client relationship creating a duty of care by the defendant attorney; …
- A-2130-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2130-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HERRON ALSTON, a/k/a LAMAR ALTSTON, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted December 17, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Currier. On …
- A-1778-14T1 Opinionnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1778-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KATY MILES, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________ Submitted February 27, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Currier. …
- A-1503-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1503-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GREGORY KAROL, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted October 18, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and DeAlmeida. …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0631-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. R.L., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted October 16, 2023 – Decided December 29, 2023 Before Judges Gilson and …
- A-1334-21 – PAUL MARINACCIO VS. ROMAN HERNIAK, ET AL. (L-1452-21, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… had their genesis in his conviction for municipal ordinance violations issued in 2016 by defendant East Hanover Police … his successful defense of the alleged municipal ordinance violations. 11 A-1334-21 Additionally, it is well-accepted …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3984-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SANDRA NOLLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________ Submitted March 14, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and …
- 2C:29-2b Charges Document PDFnjcourts.gov… it is alleged that the defendant [list motor vehicle violations or vessel violations alleged, and list their elements, taking care to list only those violations that allegedly occurred after the signal to …
- A-3984-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3984-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SANDRA NOLLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________ Submitted March 14, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and …
- Russo, John F. - 2017-225 ACJC Casenjcourts.gov… Court concluded, because of the seriousness of the ethical violations, that it was appropriate to consider the full … Court concluded, because of the seriousness of the ethical violations, that it was appropriate to consider the full … involved in Count I in particular, the most serious of the violations, reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the …
- njcourts.gov… of, [it] may be EVICTED." The notice listed various acts or violations of the Lease and advised Tenant that "if [it] d[i]d not cease all abovementioned violations by January 30, 2024, . . . [it] will be evicted … Possession." The January notice repeated the same acts and violations stated in the December notice. 6 A-0011-24 In May …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1745-22 KIMBERLY A. ZACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent, and MOROLAKE ESI, Defendant. __________________________ Argued March 11, 2024 – Decided …
- njcourts.gov… phone call was placed. There need not be a pattern of violations to warrant prosecution for contempt of a domestic … the de minimis provision can apply in cases involving violations of restraining orders, we conclude it does not … call. The fact it is possible to conceive far more serious violations does not render the present prosecution absurd, …
- PRINCELY ADIKIBE-EJIOQU VS. PARTNERS PHARMACY (L-0552-20, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… routine audit and observed plaintiff "commit[ing] multiple violations of USP[]797" on July 3, 2019, including: 11 … that on July 2, 2019, plaintiff committed the following violations: "(a) enter[ing] the Cleanroom without removing … to either wash or dry his hands," along with other listed violations. After reviewing additional video footage from …
- A-2589-21 – PRINCELY ADIKIBE-EJIOQU VS. PARTNERS PHARMACY (L-0552-20, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… routine audit and observed plaintiff "commit[ing] multiple violations of USP[]797" on July 3, 2019, including: 11 … that on July 2, 2019, plaintiff committed the following violations: "(a) enter[ing] the Cleanroom without removing … to either wash or dry his hands," along with other listed violations. After reviewing additional video footage from …
- njcourts.gov… phone call was placed. There need not be a pattern of violations to warrant prosecution for contempt of a domestic … the de minimis provision can apply in cases involving violations of restraining orders, we conclude it does not … call. The fact it is possible to conceive far more serious violations does not render the present prosecution absurd, …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1745-22 KIMBERLY A. ZACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent, and MOROLAKE ESI, Defendant. __________________________ Argued March 11, 2024 – Decided …
- njcourts.gov… of, [it] may be EVICTED." The notice listed various acts or violations of the Lease and advised Tenant that "if [it] d[i]d not cease all abovementioned violations by January 30, 2024, . . . [it] will be evicted … Possession." The January notice repeated the same acts and violations stated in the December notice. 6 A-0011-24 In May …
- njcourts.gov… for the Act to impose substantial financial penalties for violations. We conclude that Dugan's holding did not require … record that day. Initially, the judge opined that the CFA "violations here [were] not clearly established[,] which … maintain a (b)(2) class action for purported 10 A-5177-17T2 violations of the CFA. The judge stated that although the …