Filters
- njcourts.gov… addition to his position as mayor. We affirm the finding of violations, but vacate the imposition of a penalty, and … a penalty. There is no element of the substantive statutory violations to which good faith reliance on counsel's advice …
- SOOK HEE LEE VS. JONATHAN KIM, ET AL. (FM-02-1745-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… a claim for equal protection, free speech, and privacy violations under the New Jersey Constitution. This appeal …
- A-5063-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… POINT VIII THE STATE COMMITTED DISCOVERY AND [BRADY3] VIOLATIONS WHEN IT FAILED TO DISCLOSE TO DEFENSE … ON FRUCCI. F. THE STATE COMMITTED DISCOVERY AND [BRADY] VIOLATIONS WHEN IT FAILED TO DISCLOSE TO DEFENSE … THE STATE'S CUMULATIVE DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE AND [BRADY] VIOLATIONS RESULTED IN A TRIAL THAT WAS FUNDAMENTALLY …
- A-1699-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… addition to his position as mayor. We affirm the finding of violations, but vacate the imposition of a penalty, and … a penalty. There is no element of the substantive statutory violations to which good faith reliance on counsel's advice …
- A-5126-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… a claim for equal protection, free speech, and privacy violations under the New Jersey Constitution. This appeal …
- A-0908-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.govRECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0908-16T2 W.G., Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted January 29, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Messano and …
- #09-09 Administrative Directivesnjcourts.govADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS STATE OF NEW JERSEY GLENN A. GRANT, J.A.D. ACTING ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS RICHARD J. HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX PO BOX 037 TRENTON, NEW JERSEY 08625-0037 [Questions may be directed to (609) 984-4557] …
- njcourts.gov… determining if there were any Uniform Fire Code (UFC) violations or other safety issues regarding the building. … of Fire Safety in February 2016, which identified multiple violations of the UFC and other deficiencies at the Travel … another notice of violation of the UFC, finding the same violations identified in his February 2016 inspection and …
- A-1649-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MICHAEL J. FIGUEROA (21-07-0552, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… articulable suspicion defendant committed motor vehicle violations, is without merit. Sufficient 9 A-1649-22 …
- njcourts.gov… for the Act to impose substantial financial penalties for violations. We conclude that Dugan's holding did not require … record that day. Initially, the judge opined that the CFA "violations here [were] not clearly established[,] which … maintain a (b)(2) class action for purported 10 A-5177-17T2 violations of the CFA. The judge stated that although the …
- njcourts.gov… Court concluded, because of the seriousness of the ethical violations, that it was appropriate to consider the full … Court concluded, because of the seriousness of the ethical violations, that it was appropriate to consider the full … involved in Count I in particular, the most serious of the violations, reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the …
- njcourts.govSYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
- A-5177-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… for the Act to impose substantial financial penalties for violations. We conclude that Dugan's holding did not require … record that day. Initially, the judge opined that the CFA "violations here [were] not clearly established[,] which … maintain a (b)(2) class action for purported 10 A-5177-17T2 violations of the CFA. The judge stated that although the …
- A-71-15 Opinionnjcourts.govSYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
- Supreme Court Opinion (May 26, 2020 - Russo, John F. ACJC Documentsnjcourts.gov… Court concluded, because of the seriousness of the ethical violations, that it was appropriate to consider the full … Court concluded, because of the seriousness of the ethical violations, that it was appropriate to consider the full … involved in Count I in particular, the most serious of the violations, reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the …
- njcourts.gov… from the Department of Banking and Insurance ("DOBI"). Violations of the statute expose defendants to civil … those debts. [N.J.S.A. 17:16G-1(c) (emphasis added).] Any violations remained subject to up to a $500 civil penalty. … rejected plaintiff's claims of free speech and civil rights violations. This Appeal Plaintiffs appealed. Given the …
- njcourts.gov… Court concluded, because of the seriousness of the ethical violations, that it was appropriate to consider the full … Court concluded, because of the seriousness of the ethical violations, that it was appropriate to consider the full … involved in Count I in particular, the most serious of the violations, reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2566-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. F.B.I., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted March 11, 2024 – Decided July 26, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARTI WOODWARD (16-11-1138, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… subject of how to consider defendant's prior motor vehicle violations, the judge charged the jury: Normally, evidence of a defendant's prior motor vehicle violations is not permitted under our Rules of Evidence. … evidence that a defendant has committed prior motor vehicle violations when it is offered only to show that she has a …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5737-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARK PLASKON, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ Submitted May 14, 2020 – Decided June 17, 2020 Before Judges Alvarez and …