Filters
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-0233-15T3 A-0291-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … We uphold a trial judge's factual findings if they are "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
- A-0233-15T3/A-0291-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-0233-15T3 A-0291-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … We uphold a trial judge's factual findings if they are "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4907-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … convincing evidence. The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. Based on our review of the record … caretaker in their experiential world." Accordingly, termination of defendant's parental rights would result in …
- A-4907-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4907-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … convincing evidence. The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. Based on our review of the record … caretaker in their experiential world." Accordingly, termination of defendant's parental rights would result in …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0853-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … record shows the factual findings of the trial judge are supported by substantial credible evidence, including his … issued a permanency order accepting the Division's plan for termination of parental rights. On September 7, 2017, N.W. …
- A-0853-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0853-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … record shows the factual findings of the trial judge are supported by substantial credible evidence, including his … issued a permanency order accepting the Division's plan for termination of parental rights. On September 7, 2017, N.W. …
- A-2799-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2799-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … request to change the permanency plan from reunification to termination of parental rights followed by adoption. In … a strong likelihood of significant or lasting change to support her being the independent caretaker of the children. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2746-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … biological father, E.S., has not appealed from the termination of his parental rights. On appeal, Tiffany … were significant concerns with [Tiffany] and [he] did not support her 7 A-2746-20 being an independent caretaker of …
- A-2746-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2746-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … biological father, E.S., has not appealed from the termination of his parental rights. On appeal, Tiffany … were significant concerns with [Tiffany] and [he] did not support her 7 A-2746-20 being an independent caretaker of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1887-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to Albert. Based on his evaluations, Dr. Lee stated that he supported a permanency plan for Albert where he would be … Division had presented clear and convincing evidence that termination of Samantha's parental rights would not do more …
- A-1887-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1887-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to Albert. Based on his evaluations, Dr. Lee stated that he supported a permanency plan for Albert where he would be … Division had presented clear and convincing evidence that termination of Samantha's parental rights would not do more …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1270-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … provided clear and convincing evidence that all four prongs supported the termination of defendant's parental rights. We …
- A-1270-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1270-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … provided clear and convincing evidence that all four prongs supported the termination of defendant's parental rights. We …
- njcourts.gov… under appeal: (1) reduced plaintiff Paul Stewart's child support and alimony obligations based on a change of … support and alimony obligations and remand for a new determination of plaintiff's child support and alimony …
- A-5135-17T2/A-1048-19T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… under appeal: (1) reduced plaintiff Paul Stewart's child support and alimony obligations based on a change of … support and alimony obligations and remand for a new determination of plaintiff's child support and alimony …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0593-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the evidence presented by the Division overwhelmingly supports Judge Axelrad's decision to terminate Bob's … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and and M.H. are not …
- A-0593-21 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0593-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the evidence presented by the Division overwhelmingly supports Judge Axelrad's decision to terminate Bob's … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and and M.H. are not …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0593-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the evidence presented by the Division overwhelmingly supports Judge Axelrad's decision to terminate Bob's … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and and M.H. are not …
- njcourts.gov… of Licensing Somerset/Hunterdon/Warren Department of Children and Families Jeyanthi Rajaraman, Esq. Valerie … 2 CHAPTER 3 – TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS … the regular and expected parental functions of care and support of the child, although able to do so, or (2) That …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2357-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence.2 The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …