njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3062-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … at which time the court accepted the Division's plan for termination of parental rights followed by adoption. The … 'should not be disturbed unless they are so wholly unsupportable as to result in a denial of justice. '" N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3062-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … at which time the court accepted the Division's plan for termination of parental rights followed by adoption. The … 'should not be disturbed unless they are so wholly unsupportable as to result in a denial of justice. '" N.J. …
njcourts.gov
… under appeal: (1) reduced plaintiff Paul Stewart's child support and alimony obligations based on a change of … support and alimony obligations and remand for a new determination of plaintiff's child support and alimony …
-
njcourts.gov
… under appeal: (1) reduced plaintiff Paul Stewart's child support and alimony obligations based on a change of … support and alimony obligations and remand for a new determination of plaintiff's child support and alimony …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3188-17T3 A-3189-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … necessary prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), to warrant the termination of defendants' respective parental rights. Among … NOT HAVE BEEN IGNORED. POINT II: THE FACTS BELOW DO NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL FINDING THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS UNDER N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3188-17T3 A-3189-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … necessary prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), to warrant the termination of defendants' respective parental rights. Among … NOT HAVE BEEN IGNORED. POINT II: THE FACTS BELOW DO NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL FINDING THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS UNDER N.J.S.A. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0543-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … we find substantial credible evidence in the record to support the judge's determination. The facts as developed at trial are summarized …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0543-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … we find substantial credible evidence in the record to support the judge's determination. The facts as developed at trial are summarized …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0233-15T3 A-0291-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … We uphold a trial judge's factual findings if they are "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0233-15T3 A-0291-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … We uphold a trial judge's factual findings if they are "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0853-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … record shows the factual findings of the trial judge are supported by substantial credible evidence, including his … issued a permanency order accepting the Division's plan for termination of parental rights. On September 7, 2017, N.W. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0853-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … record shows the factual findings of the trial judge are supported by substantial credible evidence, including his … issued a permanency order accepting the Division's plan for termination of parental rights. On September 7, 2017, N.W. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4907-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … convincing evidence. The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. Based on our review of the record … caretaker in their experiential world." Accordingly, termination of defendant's parental rights would result in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4907-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … convincing evidence. The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. Based on our review of the record … caretaker in their experiential world." Accordingly, termination of defendant's parental rights would result in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2799-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … request to change the permanency plan from reunification to termination of parental rights followed by adoption. In … a strong likelihood of significant or lasting change to support her being the independent caretaker of the children. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2746-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … biological father, E.S., has not appealed from the termination of his parental rights. On appeal, Tiffany … were significant concerns with [Tiffany] and [he] did not support her 7 A-2746-20 being an independent caretaker of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2746-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … biological father, E.S., has not appealed from the termination of his parental rights. On appeal, Tiffany … were significant concerns with [Tiffany] and [he] did not support her 7 A-2746-20 being an independent caretaker of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1887-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to Albert. Based on his evaluations, Dr. Lee stated that he supported a permanency plan for Albert where he would be … Division had presented clear and convincing evidence that termination of Samantha's parental rights would not do more …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1887-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to Albert. Based on his evaluations, Dr. Lee stated that he supported a permanency plan for Albert where he would be … Division had presented clear and convincing evidence that termination of Samantha's parental rights would not do more …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0593-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the evidence presented by the Division overwhelmingly supports Judge Axelrad's decision to terminate Bob's … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and and M.H. are not …