njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … in which it is undisputed defendant was administered incomplete Miranda warnings, defendant disclosed the location … a window, the officers told [d]efendant that he needed to come to the door and talk with them because he was being …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … record of any offense . . . . If you were to successfully complete . . . PTI . . . there would be a suspension of the … limits his ineffective assistance of counsel claims to two points for our consideration: POINT ONE [DEFENDANT] IS …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … of its at-will employees for posting racially insensitive comments about the Black Lives Matter movement on her … partners reflect a diverse set of customs, values[,] and points of view. Do not be afraid to be yourself, but do so …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 15, 2023 – Decided June 8, 2023 Before Judges Mayer and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … by their first names to avoid any confusion caused by their common last name. No disrespect is intended. 9 A-0078-21 it … followed. II. On appeal, defendant presents the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE PCR COURT …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 19, 2023 – Decided May 31, 2023 Before Judges Mayer and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … to proceed to trial and maintained his innocence. The trial commenced on September 18, 2018. Green was set to testify on … issue on direct appeal. II. Defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 7, 2023 – Decided May 12, 2023 Before Judges Geiger and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … Harvey argued the cause for appellant (Lomurro, Munson, Comer, Brown & Schottland, LLC, attorneys; Peter H. Lederman … Deitch found the encounter was also authorized under the community-caretaking doctrine. After carefully reviewing the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 30, 2022 – Decided February 27, 2023 Before Judges Accurso and Marczyk. On appeal from the Superior … appeals on his own behalf from an order dismissing his complaint against defendants City of Hoboken, Linda … no further information, Albasir filed a Special Civil Part complaint seeking $14,500 in damages for the City's 4 …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 6, 2023 — Decided February 14, 2023 Before Judges Whipple, Mawla, and Marczyk. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … officer whose pension was the parties' source of income. They resided in a home D.W.P. received from his … FRO was granted. In A-2645-21, D.W.P. raises the following points: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT ENTERED A[N …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 28, 2022 – Decided January 11, 2023 Before Judges Bishop-Thompson and Puglisi. On appeal from the … of PCR but remand for the court to resentence defendant to comply with State v. Torres, 246 N.J. 268 (2021). I. On … defense counsel's cross-examination of A.G. brought out any points to which Logrono would have testified if her …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 2, 2022 – Decided December 27, 2022 Before Judges Gooden Brown and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … of $11,341.47 by December 31, 2020. Initially, defendant complied with the forbearance agreement, making three … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: 12 A-1773-21 POINT I3 THE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 15, 2022 – Decided December 7, 2022 Before Judges Geiger and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … then cross-moved for summary judgment, arguing the complaint should be dismissed pursuant to the entire … This appeal followed. Defendants raise the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE THE TRIAL COURT …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 31, 2022 – Decided November 23, 2022 Before Judges Smith and Marczyk. On appeal from the Superior … unsettling interactions between P.R. and Rob. Based on a combination of the witnesses' accounts and criminal history … to avoid "bog[ging] down his appellate brief with 'lesser' points . . . he did not raise [the mistrial issue]." The PCR …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 19, 2022 – Decided October 6, 2022 Before Judges Currier and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … conviction and sentence in a written decision and accompanying order. The judge further found defendant failed … admissible as evidence of his DWI and the test procedure complied with the Chun requirements. Moreover, the court …
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 24, 2022 – Decided October 4, 2022 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … Officer Corado smelled an odor of burnt marijuana coming from the car. He was able to identify the odor based … and as a result of that cooperation, other persons in the community were "after him." Defendant explained that he had …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 26, 2022 – Decided October 3, 2022 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … The man, who did not identify himself, said "the guy's coming up the block, the guy's coming up the block ." He described the individual as a …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 15, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sumners and Mitterhoff. On appeal from Superior … DEPRIVED DEFENDANT OF A FAIR TRIAL. A. The Trial Judge Committed Reversible Error By Prohibiting Defense Counsel … it a defaced firearm. 2 Defendant did not attempt to revisit the ruling at the re-trial. 5 A-0940-16T3 II The trial …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 22, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Mitterhoff. On appeal from Superior … a report of shots fired in the parking lot of an apartment complex in Millville. No one believed to be involved with … a new trial. Specifically, defendant raises the following points in his brief: POINT I THE JURY CHARGE GIVEN BY THE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 16, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … killing. While court-ordered evaluations found defendant competent to stand trial, they also indicated defendant … granted the 1 Defendant's plea agreement provided for a recommended twenty-five-year prison term. 2 Miranda v. …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 10, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Gilson and Natali. On appeal from Superior Court … 10-12-1200. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (William P. Welaj, Designated Counsel, on the … ended. Approximately eight minutes later, the interview recommenced and the following colloquy ensued: DETECTIVE: Okay …
njcourts.gov
… telephonically April 12, 2018 – Decided July 23, 2018 Before Judges Nugent and Geiger. On appeal from Superior Court … which enforced the ruling of the second Rabbinical court, compelling plaintiffs to comply with its earlier rulings or … appeal followed. On appeal, plaintiffs raise the following points: POINT I THE 2012 DENIAL OF JUDGMENT ORDER WAS BEYOND …