-
njcourts.gov
… 11 may present an expungement application to the Superior Court 12 pursuant to this section if: 13 the person has been … means and 21 includes any fine, restitution, and other court-ordered financial 22 assessment imposed by the court as part of the sentence for the 23 conviction, for …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for … It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, … Decided July 6, 2016 LaVECCHIA, J., writing for a unanimous Court. In this appeal, the Court considers the following …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … On appeal from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Morris County, Docket No. … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2390-23 … Judges Mayer and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Cumberland County, … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1936-21 … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion … Judges Accurso and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Docket …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0921-20 … Berdote Byrne and Fisher. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0702-24 … Judges Firko and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3514-23 … Susswein, Chase and Augostini. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean County, Docket No. … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1118-21 … Judges Vernoia and Natali. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Indictment … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1953-21 … Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1886-22 … Before Judges Chase and Vinci. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Atlantic County, … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Before Judges Nugent and Accurso. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Indictment … Prosecutor, attorney for respondent. PER CURIAM The Supreme Court has remanded this Graves Act motion for leave to …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Judges Ostrer and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Indictment … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
… Provides that AOC shall administer program for municipal courts allowing defendants to engage in online plea … AN ACT concerning 3 [plea bargaining in] certain3 municipal court 1 3procedures,3 and amending P.L.2000, c.75. 2 3 BE IT … read 7 as follows: 8 2. a. In accordance with the Rules of Court adopted by the 9 Supreme Court of New Jersey 3or …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Judges Ostrer and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Indictment … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Before Judges Nugent and Accurso. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Indictment … Prosecutor, attorney for respondent. PER CURIAM The Supreme Court has remanded this Graves Act motion for leave to …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1953-21 … Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
… et al Plaintiff Vs. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY FOSAMAX … NO. 282 ORDER THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court upon motion by Fox Rothschild LLP, attorney for … was dismissed without prejudice on April 28, 2023, and the Court having read and considered the papers submitted in …
-
njcourts.gov
… et al Plaintiff Vs. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY FOSAMAX … NO. 282 ORDER THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court upon motion by Fox Rothschild LLP, attorney for … was dismissed without prejudice on April 28, 2023, and the Court having read and considered the papers submitted in …
-
njcourts.gov
… et al Plaintiff Vs. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY FOSAMAX … NO. 282 ORDER THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court upon motion by Fox Rothschild LLP, attorney for … was dismissed without prejudice on April 28, 2023, and the Court having read and considered the papers submitted in …