njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0631-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. R.L., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted October 16, 2023 – Decided December 29, 2023 Before Judges Gilson and …
njcourts.gov
… had their genesis in his conviction for municipal ordinance violations issued in 2016 by defendant East Hanover Police … his successful defense of the alleged municipal ordinance violations. 11 A-1334-21 Additionally, it is well-accepted …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2130-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HERRON ALSTON, a/k/a LAMAR ALTSTON, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted December 17, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Currier. On …
njcourts.gov
… the trial judge determined, plaintiff's complaint alleged violations of the NJCRA under the state-created-danger …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1503-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GREGORY KAROL, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted October 18, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and DeAlmeida. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1778-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KATY MILES, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________ Submitted February 27, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Currier. …
-
5.51A
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
CHARGE 5.51A ― Page 1 of 10 5.51A LEGAL MALPRACTICE (Approved 06/1979; Revised 10/2022) NOTE TO JUDGE The elements of a legal malpractice action are “(1) the existence of an attorney-client relationship creating a duty of care by the defendant attorney; …
-
njcourts.gov
… the trial judge determined, plaintiff's complaint alleged violations of the NJCRA under the state-created-danger …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2130-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HERRON ALSTON, a/k/a LAMAR ALTSTON, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted December 17, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Currier. On …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1778-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KATY MILES, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________ Submitted February 27, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Currier. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1503-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GREGORY KAROL, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted October 18, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and DeAlmeida. …
-
njcourts.gov
… had their genesis in his conviction for municipal ordinance violations issued in 2016 by defendant East Hanover Police … his successful defense of the alleged municipal ordinance violations. 11 A-1334-21 Additionally, it is well-accepted …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0631-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. R.L., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted October 16, 2023 – Decided December 29, 2023 Before Judges Gilson and …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3984-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SANDRA NOLLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________ Submitted March 14, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and …
-
2C:29-2b
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… it is alleged that the defendant [list motor vehicle violations or vessel violations alleged, and list their elements, taking care to list only those violations that allegedly occurred after the signal to …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3984-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SANDRA NOLLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________ Submitted March 14, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and …
njcourts.gov
… Court concluded, because of the seriousness of the ethical violations, that it was appropriate to consider the full … Court concluded, because of the seriousness of the ethical violations, that it was appropriate to consider the full … involved in Count I in particular, the most serious of the violations, reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the …
njcourts.gov
… of, [it] may be EVICTED." The notice listed various acts or violations of the Lease and advised Tenant that "if [it] d[i]d not cease all abovementioned violations by January 30, 2024, . . . [it] will be evicted … Possession." The January notice repeated the same acts and violations stated in the December notice. 6 A-0011-24 In May …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1745-22 KIMBERLY A. ZACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent, and MOROLAKE ESI, Defendant. __________________________ Argued March 11, 2024 – Decided …
njcourts.gov
… phone call was placed. There need not be a pattern of violations to warrant prosecution for contempt of a domestic … the de minimis provision can apply in cases involving violations of restraining orders, we conclude it does not … call. The fact it is possible to conceive far more serious violations does not render the present prosecution absurd, …