-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5021-16T1 CHARLES KANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS and CALVIN LEDFORD, Defendants-Respondents. _______________________________ Argued September 20, 2018 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… based upon the fact that the "history of Title 39 violations . . . reveal[ed] defendant's multiple instances … abuse of discretion, based upon the defendant's record of violations and the additional factors considered by the …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2B:12-17. By statute, that jurisdiction is limited to a. Violations of county or municipal ordinances; b. Violations of the motor vehicle and traffic laws; c. … exclusive jurisdiction is given to the Superior Court; d. Violations of the fish and game laws; e. Proceedings to …
-
njcourts.gov
… a general contractor shares "responsibility for those violations by its subcontractors which it could reasonably … contractor exercised reasonable care to prevent and detect violations of OSHA standards on a construction site, OSHA … were violated and whether Cardinal was citable for those violations, but his report also identified standards adopted …
-
njcourts.gov
… that they prove in all cases that their complaints involve violations of a defined public policy." Id. at 610. Because …
-
njcourts.gov
… which was the only written documentation of plaintiff's violations prior to a September 8, 2015 final written … near the center of the page listing a number of conduct violations. Seven violations are checked, including but not limited to …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1249-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TASHON RIVERA, a/k/a TYJUAN RIVERA and DAQUAN TABOR, Defendant-Appellant. Argued February 11, 2020 – Decided April 9, 2020 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
… bedrails and caused Joseph's death. The complaint asserted violations of a resident's rights under the Act, violations of defendants' responsibilities under the Act, … denied summary judgment as to the claims of negligence and violations of the Act. The motion court also rejected …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4776-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAM GRAHAM, III, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________________ Submitted May 3, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Manahan and Lisa. …
-
njcourts.gov
… FOR BELIEVING THAT DEFENDANT HAD COMMITTED MOTOR VEHICLE VIOLATIONS, THEREFORE THE TRAFFIC STOP WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL …
-
njcourts.gov
… "refund provision" of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11 applies only to violations of the Truth in Menu Act of 1980, N.J.S.A. … and "declared herein" limits the scope of this remedy to violations of the Truth in Menu Act. N.J.S. . 56:8-2.11. … assumed that the refund provision applies to all CF A violations and did not mention the Truth in Menu Act, …
-
njcourts.gov
… a letter stating that his termination was based on alleged "violations of Employee Standards of Conduct, Exelon Code of …
-
njcourts.gov
… a.m. The investigation revealed Errigo committed similar violations on five prior occasions. Although Errigo was …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2635-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANGEL ALAMO, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted November 28, 2023 – Decided January 30, 2024 Before Judges Whipple and …
njcourts.gov
… and considered all relevant facts pertaining to Mr. Ross' violations of the conditions 3 A-3791-16T4 of his mandatory …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5135-16T2 ALAINE M. KRAJICEK, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and CATAMARAN MEDIA COMPANY, LLC, Respondents. _____________________________________ Argued September 20, 2018 – …
-
njcourts.gov
… and considered all relevant facts pertaining to Mr. Ross' violations of the conditions 3 A-3791-16T4 of his mandatory …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5135-16T2 ALAINE M. KRAJICEK, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and CATAMARAN MEDIA COMPANY, LLC, Respondents. _____________________________________ Argued September 20, 2018 – …
-
A-0634-22 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… manifest errors of fact including, but not limited to, violations of my constitutional rights. Reversal and remand …
njcourts.gov
… rights. The judge stated, [Legg] evaluated the alleged violations of the no- contact order, and decided that …