njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5214-17T1 A-5215-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C.A. §§ 1901-1963. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. We …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5214-17T1 A-5215-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C.A. §§ 1901-1963. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. We …
default
… DOCKET NOS. A-3188-17T3 A-3189-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … necessary prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), to warrant the termination of defendants' respective parental rights. Among … NOT HAVE BEEN IGNORED. POINT II: THE FACTS BELOW DO NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL FINDING THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS UNDER N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3188-17T3 A-3189-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … necessary prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), to warrant the termination of defendants' respective parental rights. Among … NOT HAVE BEEN IGNORED. POINT II: THE FACTS BELOW DO NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL FINDING THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS UNDER N.J.S.A. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0593-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the evidence presented by the Division overwhelmingly supports Judge Axelrad's decision to terminate Bob's … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and and M.H. are not …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0593-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the evidence presented by the Division overwhelmingly supports Judge Axelrad's decision to terminate Bob's … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and and M.H. are not …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0593-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the evidence presented by the Division overwhelmingly supports Judge Axelrad's decision to terminate Bob's … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and and M.H. are not …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0233-15T3 A-0291-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … We uphold a trial judge's factual findings if they are "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0233-15T3 A-0291-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … We uphold a trial judge's factual findings if they are "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… of Licensing Somerset/Hunterdon/Warren Department of Children and Families Jeyanthi Rajaraman, Esq. Valerie … 2 CHAPTER 3 – TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS … the regular and expected parental functions of care and support of the child, although able to do so, or (2) That …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2746-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … biological father, E.S., has not appealed from the termination of his parental rights. On appeal, Tiffany … were significant concerns with [Tiffany] and [he] did not support her 7 A-2746-20 being an independent caretaker of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2746-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … biological father, E.S., has not appealed from the termination of his parental rights. On appeal, Tiffany … were significant concerns with [Tiffany] and [he] did not support her 7 A-2746-20 being an independent caretaker of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4837-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … home at that time. Ibid. The Division, which had initiated termination proceedings, eventually dismissed the pending … of review, we must uphold the trial court's findings if "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4837-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … home at that time. Ibid. The Division, which had initiated termination proceedings, eventually dismissed the pending … of review, we must uphold the trial court's findings if "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4907-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … convincing evidence. The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. Based on our review of the record … caretaker in their experiential world." Accordingly, termination of defendant's parental rights would result in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4907-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … convincing evidence. The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. Based on our review of the record … caretaker in their experiential world." Accordingly, termination of defendant's parental rights would result in …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1887-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to Albert. Based on his evaluations, Dr. Lee stated that he supported a permanency plan for Albert where he would be … Division had presented clear and convincing evidence that termination of Samantha's parental rights would not do more …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1887-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to Albert. Based on his evaluations, Dr. Lee stated that he supported a permanency plan for Albert where he would be … Division had presented clear and convincing evidence that termination of Samantha's parental rights would not do more …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2623-16T4 A-2624-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports termination and urges us to affirm the trial judge's …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2623-16T4 A-2624-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports termination and urges us to affirm the trial judge's …