Filters
- A-1249-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1249-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TASHON RIVERA, a/k/a TYJUAN RIVERA and DAQUAN TABOR, Defendant-Appellant. Argued February 11, 2020 – Decided April 9, 2020 Before Judges …
- A-5021-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5021-16T1 CHARLES KANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS and CALVIN LEDFORD, Defendants-Respondents. _______________________________ Argued September 20, 2018 – Decided …
- A-3544-13T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… bedrails and caused Joseph's death. The complaint asserted violations of a resident's rights under the Act, violations of defendants' responsibilities under the Act, … denied summary judgment as to the claims of negligence and violations of the Act. The motion court also rejected …
- A-4776-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4776-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAM GRAHAM, III, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________________ Submitted May 3, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Manahan and Lisa. …
- A-5318-14T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… FOR BELIEVING THAT DEFENDANT HAD COMMITTED MOTOR VEHICLE VIOLATIONS, THEREFORE THE TRAFFIC STOP WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2635-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANGEL ALAMO, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted November 28, 2023 – Decided January 30, 2024 Before Judges Whipple and …
- njcourts.gov… "refund provision" of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.11 applies only to violations of the Truth in Menu Act of 1980, N.J.S.A. … and "declared herein" limits the scope of this remedy to violations of the Truth in Menu Act. N.J.S. . 56:8-2.11. … assumed that the refund provision applies to all CF A violations and did not mention the Truth in Menu Act, …
- njcourts.gov… and considered all relevant facts pertaining to Mr. Ross' violations of the conditions 3 A-3791-16T4 of his mandatory …
- ALAINE M. KRAJICEK VS. BOARD OF REVIEW, ET AL. (BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5135-16T2 ALAINE M. KRAJICEK, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and CATAMARAN MEDIA COMPANY, LLC, Respondents. _____________________________________ Argued September 20, 2018 – …
- A-5135-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5135-16T2 ALAINE M. KRAJICEK, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and CATAMARAN MEDIA COMPANY, LLC, Respondents. _____________________________________ Argued September 20, 2018 – …
- A-3791-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… and considered all relevant facts pertaining to Mr. Ross' violations of the conditions 3 A-3791-16T4 of his mandatory …
- A-0634-22 Briefs Briefsnjcourts.gov… manifest errors of fact including, but not limited to, violations of my constitutional rights. Reversal and remand …
- njcourts.gov… rights. The judge stated, [Legg] evaluated the alleged violations of the no- contact order, and decided that …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SOLIMAN YOUSSEF(1-2016, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5079-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SOLIMAN YOUSSEF, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________ Submitted July 13, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Haas. …
- A-5079-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5079-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SOLIMAN YOUSSEF, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________ Submitted July 13, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Haas. …
- A-0319-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… rights. The judge stated, [Legg] evaluated the alleged violations of the no- contact order, and decided that …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. STACY D. JACKSON (22-034-F, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… which lane he was in when he observed the alleged traffic violations. He agreed that the best vantage point to observe the alleged violations that occurred at the intersection would have been … compromised by the angle from which he observed the alleged violations. He further agreed that he assumed, based on his …
- njcourts.govRECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3013-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARCO R. GAINES, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued March 17, 2021 – Decided July 16, 2021 Before Judges …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0273-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. IAN GALLOWAY, Defendant-Appellant. Argued October 19, 2021 – Decided November 29, 2021 Before Judges Fisher and Currier. On appeal from the …
- njcourts.gov… A November 2020 evaluation concluded F.R.'s repeated violations "do not appear to be the result of purposeful … F.R.'s low intellectual functioning contributed to the violations and use of social media. The evaluation further … since his Megan's Law conviction "consists only of parole violations and a sanctioning by the parole board, which are …