-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3453-21 GARNELL BAILEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND, Respondent-Respondent. _________________________ Submitted September 20, 2023 – Decided …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5291-15T1 STEPHEN STANZIANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL FRESSOLA and ELENA ZSOLDOS, Defendants, and MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Respondent. __________________________________ Submitted …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0565-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BYRON D. KEMP, a/k/a BYRON D. KEMP, JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted February 28, 2022 – Decided March 8, 2022 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0565-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BYRON D. KEMP, a/k/a BYRON D. KEMP, JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted February 28, 2022 – Decided March 8, 2022 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5291-15T1 STEPHEN STANZIANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL FRESSOLA and ELENA ZSOLDOS, Defendants, and MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Respondent. __________________________________ Submitted …
njcourts.gov
… three disciplinary charges against him. II. Our review of decisions by administrative agencies is limited. In re … the Commission's agency practice not to disturb initial decisions concerning minor disciplinary actions unless …
njcourts.gov
… opportunity to challenge prosecutorial sentencing decisions for arbitrary or discriminatory treatment. E. The … by standards, inform defendants of the basis for their decisions, and are subject to judicial oversight." Id. at …
njcourts.gov
… Vay, 272 N.J. Super. 199, 205–06 (App. Div. 1993). Parole decisions are "individualized discretionary appraisals." … v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 62 N.J. 348, 359 (1973)). Those decisions, moreover, are inherently subjective, and … her family and suicidal ideation. The series of choices, decisions and actions on [his] part were over an extended …
-
njcourts.gov
… opportunity to challenge prosecutorial sentencing decisions for arbitrary or discriminatory treatment. E. The … by standards, inform defendants of the basis for their decisions, and are subject to judicial oversight." Id. at …
-
njcourts.gov
… Vay, 272 N.J. Super. 199, 205–06 (App. Div. 1993). Parole decisions are "individualized discretionary appraisals." … v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 62 N.J. 348, 359 (1973)). Those decisions, moreover, are inherently subjective, and … her family and suicidal ideation. The series of choices, decisions and actions on [his] part were over an extended …
-
njcourts.gov
… three disciplinary charges against him. II. Our review of decisions by administrative agencies is limited. In re … the Commission's agency practice not to disturb initial decisions concerning minor disciplinary actions unless …
njcourts.gov
… to reopen his detention hearing, we review a trial court's decisions to release or detain a defendant for an abuse of … a 'material bearing' on the standard that governs release decisions[.]" Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 2A:162-19(f)). In our … on the record at the hearing as support for its revocation decisions. The problem is that, as noted, the court had not …
-
njcourts.gov
… to reopen his detention hearing, we review a trial court's decisions to release or detain a defendant for an abuse of … a 'material bearing' on the standard that governs release decisions[.]" Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 2A:162-19(f)). In our … on the record at the hearing as support for its revocation decisions. The problem is that, as noted, the court had not …
njcourts.gov
… LLC, 220 N.J. 289, 201-02 (2015)). We "review[] agency decisions under an arbitrary and capricious standard." …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1202-24 NOIREAYE ESSENCE, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted November 13, 2025 – Decided November 20, 2025 Before Judges Gummer …
default
… N.J. 644, 656 (1999). 7 A-4092-17T3 Our deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions …
njcourts.gov
… Herrmann, 192 N.J. 19, 28 (2007)). Our deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions …
njcourts.gov
… 2A LAW, THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE REGULATIONS, 2A POLICIES AS DECISIONS ARE ARBITRARY AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL. POINT V … FACTO LAWS AND U.S. CONSTITUTION. Our review of the Board's decisions is deferential. That is so because the Board's decisions are "individualized discretionary appraisals," …
njcourts.gov
… in addressing these deficiencies." Appellant appealed these decisions to the full Board, and the Board issued a final … Vey, 272 N.J. Super. 199, 205-06 (App. Div. 1993). Parole decisions are "individualized discretionary appraisals." … v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 62 N.J. 348, 359 (1973)). Those decisions, moreover, are inherently subjective, and …
njcourts.gov
… LISTED ON THE DISCIPLINARY REPORT. Judicial review of final decisions of an administrative agency is "severely limited." …