njcourts.gov
… Argued March 20, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Mawla. On appeal from Superior … Enviro-Sciences Inc. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint because it was barred by the statute of … [Savage, 134 N.J. at 249.] The Court finds that the latest possible date that the claim could have commenced, …
njcourts.gov
… Telephonically argued November 16, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz, Manahan and Suter. On appeal from … Pilgrim Diner and is entitled to overtime pay. Plaintiff commenced the initial action in the Chancery Division on … agreement. Thus, the cause of action accrued at the latest in 2005 when the stock transaction took place.3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Telephonically argued November 16, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz, Manahan and Suter. On appeal from … Pilgrim Diner and is entitled to overtime pay. Plaintiff commenced the initial action in the Chancery Division on … agreement. Thus, the cause of action accrued at the latest in 2005 when the stock transaction took place.3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 20, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Mawla. On appeal from Superior … Enviro-Sciences Inc. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint because it was barred by the statute of … [Savage, 134 N.J. at 249.] The Court finds that the latest possible date that the claim could have commenced, …
njcourts.gov
… telephonically March 24, 2020 – Decided May 8, 2020 Before Judges Yannotti and Currier. On appeal from the … Division dated August 26, 2019, which dismissed their complaint without prejudice and required that they arbitrate … the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court's order compelling arbitration and remand for a plenary hearing. I. …
-
njcourts.gov
… telephonically March 24, 2020 – Decided May 8, 2020 Before Judges Yannotti and Currier. On appeal from the … Division dated August 26, 2019, which dismissed their complaint without prejudice and required that they arbitrate … the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court's order compelling arbitration and remand for a plenary hearing. I. …
njcourts.gov
… of the motor vehicle stop and search, raising the following points for our consideration: 1 Following the State's … REQUIRED BECAUSE THE STATE FAILED TO PROVE THAT DEFENDANT COMMITTED A TRAFFIC OFFENSE WHEN HE CHANGED LANES WITHOUT … Code. It requires a driver to ascertain the safety of switching lanes before conducting a lane change. . . . …
-
njcourts.gov
… of the motor vehicle stop and search, raising the following points for our consideration: 1 Following the State's … REQUIRED BECAUSE THE STATE FAILED TO PROVE THAT DEFENDANT COMMITTED A TRAFFIC OFFENSE WHEN HE CHANGED LANES WITHOUT … Code. It requires a driver to ascertain the safety of switching lanes before conducting a lane change. . . . …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 6, 2024 – Decided January 17, 2025 Before Judges Smith and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … petitions and were barred. On appeal, defendant argues two points. He contends the trial court committed error when it found the third PCR petition time …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 6, 2024 – Decided January 17, 2025 Before Judges Smith and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … petitions and were barred. On appeal, defendant argues two points. He contends the trial court committed error when it found the third PCR petition time …
njcourts.gov
… opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … incident related to the County’s selection of workers’ compensation counsel in 2014. Plaintiff testified that, … She confirmed at her deposition that “[t]here was no page switched out” in Capehart & Scatchard’s proposal, and that …
-
njcourts.gov
… opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … incident related to the County’s selection of workers’ compensation counsel in 2014. Plaintiff testified that, … She confirmed at her deposition that “[t]here was no page switched out” in Capehart & Scatchard’s proposal, and that …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 30, 2023 – Decided June 14, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the … 404(b) evidence. Third, defendant argue[d] the judge compounded these errors by allowing [his wife] to testify … by characterizing the May 17, 2013 incident as merely the latest in a string of failed attempts to reconcile with his …
default
… Submitted April 8, 2019 – Decided May 14, 2019 Before Judges Messano and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … Grand Jury and charged with second-degree conspiracy to commit robbery and murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2, N.J.S.A. … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED …
default
… Submitted February 28, 2022 – Decided March 11, 2022 Before Judges Vernoia and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … Division issues a judgment in an appeal as of right and compliance with the provisions of paragraph (c) of this Rule … petition. To support his PCR claim, defendant raised two points on appeal: (1) first, the jury instruction on the …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 26, 2025 – Decided August 4, 2025 Before Judges Rose and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior … did not cite any authority supporting its order.2 2 By comparison, Rule 3:22-6A(2) mandates dismissal of a PCR … or unsupported. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: 8 A-3713-22 POINT ONE THE PCR …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 28, 2022 – Decided March 11, 2022 Before Judges Vernoia and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … Division issues a judgment in an appeal as of right and compliance with the provisions of paragraph (c) of this Rule … petition. To support his PCR claim, defendant raised two points on appeal: (1) first, the jury instruction on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 8, 2019 – Decided May 14, 2019 Before Judges Messano and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … Grand Jury and charged with second-degree conspiracy to commit robbery and murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2, N.J.S.A. … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 26, 2025 – Decided August 4, 2025 Before Judges Rose and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior … did not cite any authority supporting its order.2 2 By comparison, Rule 3:22-6A(2) mandates dismissal of a PCR … or unsupported. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: 8 A-3713-22 POINT ONE THE PCR …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 30, 2023 – Decided June 14, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the … 404(b) evidence. Third, defendant argue[d] the judge compounded these errors by allowing [his wife] to testify … by characterizing the May 17, 2013 incident as merely the latest in a string of failed attempts to reconcile with his …