-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the same reasons. Before us, Camilo argues the following point: POINT I THE DECISION OF THE PAROLE BOARD TO DENY … opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(D) and (E). Affirmed. … a2445-17.pdf … A-2445-17T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 140 N.J. 366, 378 (1995)). 2 Because each of plaintiff's point headings listed in her table of contents cite to her … written opinion. R. 2:11- 3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a2952-17.pdf … A-2952-17T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … wheelchair and scrolled through her cell phone. At one point, defendant stated to E.P., "I told you if you fell I … for defendant's transgression. Affirmed. … a5137-16.pdf … A-5137-16T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … was – I was arrested until we went to court, and at this point I don't 5 A-3270-16T3 remember because I know it got … v. Collier, 167 N.J. 427, 444 (2001)). Affirmed. … a3270-16.pdf … A-3270-16T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… PER CURIAM Defendant pled guilty to aggravated assault, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(7), causing significant … followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following single point: POINT I BECAUSE THE PROSECUTOR AND PTI DIRECTOR … in this opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a4462-15.pdf … A-4462-15T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… warrant, defendant Michael C. Battista pled guilty to second- degree possession of psilocin with intent to … was false. II. Defendant appeals and makes two arguments: POINT I – THE ARREST WARRANT WAS INVALID BECAUSE IT WAS … the issuance of the arrest warrant. Affirmed. … a5201-14.pdf … A-5201-14T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2833-14T4 ROB K. CONSTRUCTION & COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RUTGERS … defendants had led him to believe as much. The judge also pointed out that plaintiff never advised defendants 6 … and not contrary to public policy'"). Affirmed. … a2833-14.pdf … A-2833-14T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … makes the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE PTI APPLICATION SHOULD BE RECONSIDERED BECAUSE … of serious criminal activity. Affirmed. … a5266-17.pdf … A-5266-17T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … noted there was no expert testimony to date the tree to a point in time after defendants' arrival so, as to permit a … we have applied have remained uniform. … a1395-17.pdf … A-1395-17T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 4, 2018 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New … followed. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: Point I: DEFENDANT WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE … charge the trial judge was biased. Affirmed. … a5307-15.pdf … A-5307-15T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 4, 2018 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New … on appeal. II On appeal, defendant presents the following point for our consideration. POINT I: THE PCR COURT ERRED IN … outcome. See Fritz, 105 N.J. at 58. Affirmed. … a3594-16.pdf … A-3594-16T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… to plaintiff Begelman, Orlow & Melletz. We affirm. We consider the points of error 1 Formerly known as Begelman, Orlow & … while he was negotiating with them. Affirmed. … a2233-16.pdf … A-2233-16T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … articulates his arguments on this appeal as follows: POINT I: THE PCR COURT'S FINDINGS THAT THERE WERE NO … after Judge McBride issued his orders in 2022. … a0281-22.pdf … A-0281-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOHN A. DENOFA …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … arrived home during the incident and one of the defendants pointed a gun at her while the other struck Mann in the head … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a1237-23.pdf … A-1237-23 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JAMEEL ROLLINS …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … without an evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals, arguing: POINT I THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a0979-22.pdf … A-0979-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. G.L. (12-05-0354, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raised to the Law Division. Defendant asserts: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING [DEFENDANT'S] CLAIM … in its comprehensive written opinion. Affirmed. … a2526-21.pdf … A-2526-21 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MICHAEL A. SEWARD …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … that same day. On appeal, defendant argues the following: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT [DEFENDANT'S] … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a3213-22.pdf … A-3213-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. REYMOND PAGAN …
-
njcourts.gov
… VESSELIN DITTRICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 931 PARK AVENUE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION and CHAD NICKERSON, Defendants, and … merits brief, Dittrich raises seventeen legal points. Based upon our de novo review of the motion judge's … to Sorge as Dittrich contends. Affirmed. … a3966-22.pdf … A-3966-22 – VESSELIN DITTRICH VS. 931 PARK AVENUE …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … defendant presents the following arguments for our review: POINT I THE JURY AWARD OF $66,613.07 IS MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a2814-21.pdf … A-2814-21 – ROSELAND PLAZA, L.L.C. VS. THOMAS WILSON …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the State presents a sole argument for our consideration: POINT I AS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED TO ESTABLISH A … law enforcement officer, a fourth-degree crime. … a1349-21.pdf … A-1349-21 - STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DEJA M. LEWIS …