njcourts.gov
… were based on the same factual predicate as the legal malpractice claims and therefore, without an AOM, they could … we affirm the portion of the order dismissing the legal malpractice claims against Menas and Cooper Levenson in the … we conclude the court erroneously dismissed the non-legal malpractice tortious counts against Menas and Cooper …
-
njcourts.gov
… were based on the same factual predicate as the legal malpractice claims and therefore, without an AOM, they could … we affirm the portion of the order dismissing the legal malpractice claims against Menas and Cooper Levenson in the … we conclude the court erroneously dismissed the non-legal malpractice tortious counts against Menas and Cooper …
njcourts.gov
… cases is limited . R. 1:36-3. 2 A-1726-17T4 This is a legal malpractice action. Plaintiff, Brian Delaney, a former … not only his fee dispute with Sills, but also his legal malpractice claim against Sills. Otherwise enforceable … to have a jury 7 A-1726-17T4 decide issues related to malpractice, he would have never signed the initial retainer …
-
njcourts.gov
… cases is limited . R. 1:36-3. 2 A-1726-17T4 This is a legal malpractice action. Plaintiff, Brian Delaney, a former … not only his fee dispute with Sills, but also his legal malpractice claim against Sills. Otherwise enforceable … to have a jury 7 A-1726-17T4 decide issues related to malpractice, he would have never signed the initial retainer …
njcourts.gov
… THE MATTER. . . . ARGUMENT 2: WATKINS IS LIABLE FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY. POINT 1: WATKINS … CLEANING INVOICES BE FALSIFIED. POINT 3: LAW OF LEGAL MALPRACTICE LIABILITY TO THIRD PARTIES POINT 4: WATKINS … JUDGMENT MOTION. POINT 1: PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS OF LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND LEGAL STANDARD. STANDARD OF LEGAL …
njcourts.gov
… an action against defendants, asserting claims of legal malpractice relating to defendants' representation of decedent prior to his death (malpractice action). The trial court granted defendants' Rule 4:6-2(e) motion to dismiss the malpractice action on February 3, 2022. Because plaintiff …
-
njcourts.gov
… an action against defendants, asserting claims of legal malpractice relating to defendants' representation of decedent prior to his death (malpractice action). The trial court granted defendants' Rule 4:6-2(e) motion to dismiss the malpractice action on February 3, 2022. Because plaintiff …
-
njcourts.gov
… THE MATTER. . . . ARGUMENT 2: WATKINS IS LIABLE FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY. POINT 1: WATKINS … CLEANING INVOICES BE FALSIFIED. POINT 3: LAW OF LEGAL MALPRACTICE LIABILITY TO THIRD PARTIES POINT 4: WATKINS … JUDGMENT MOTION. POINT 1: PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS OF LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND LEGAL STANDARD. STANDARD OF LEGAL …
njcourts.gov
… appeals from summary judgment orders dismissing his legal malpractice action against defendants Starr, Gern, Davison, … that follow, we affirm. I. Plaintiff's claim of legal malpractice arises out of a failed business relationship. … prejudice on July 18, 2008. Plaintiff did not appeal. The Malpractice Action Plaintiff commenced the present legal …
-
njcourts.gov
… appeals from summary judgment orders dismissing his legal malpractice action against defendants Starr, Gern, Davison, … that follow, we affirm. I. Plaintiff's claim of legal malpractice arises out of a failed business relationship. … prejudice on July 18, 2008. Plaintiff did not appeal. The Malpractice Action Plaintiff commenced the present legal …
njcourts.gov
… reconsideration of the trial judge's dismissal of its legal malpractice complaint against defendants The Lenney Law … on the liability issue was fatal to SFI's professional malpractice claims. We affirm, substantially for the reasons … resolving the NJLAD case, SFI sued defendants for legal malpractice in their handling of the underlying suit. …
-
njcourts.gov
… reconsideration of the trial judge's dismissal of its legal malpractice complaint against defendants The Lenney Law … on the liability issue was fatal to SFI's professional malpractice claims. We affirm, substantially for the reasons … resolving the NJLAD case, SFI sued defendants for legal malpractice in their handling of the underlying suit. …
njcourts.gov
… (Rodney)1 summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's legal malpractice claim; (2) granting Rodney's oral motion in limine barring plaintiff's legal malpractice expert's report and testimony; and (3) … negligence against Rodney (count two) (the legal malpractice count).4 4 Count three incorporated counts one …
-
njcourts.gov
… (Rodney)1 summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's legal malpractice claim; (2) granting Rodney's oral motion in limine barring plaintiff's legal malpractice expert's report and testimony; and (3) … negligence against Rodney (count two) (the legal malpractice count).4 4 Count three incorporated counts one …
-
A-3377-22 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Legal Fees Shall Only Be Awarded to A Successful Claim for Malpractice and for Relevant Work Attributable to the Malpractice Claim ......................... 17 III. … .... 23 B. Plaintiff Failed to Prove the Underlying Malpractice Case ....................... 24 C. Plaintiff was …
njcourts.gov
… Lawrence S. Cutalo, on the brief). PER CURIAM In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff Hanna Rosenbaum appeals from … plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants for legal malpractice. The complaint alleged Britt "should have … both the motion judge and trial judge erred because her malpractice claim did not begin to accrue until the sale …
-
njcourts.gov
… Lawrence S. Cutalo, on the brief). PER CURIAM In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff Hanna Rosenbaum appeals from … plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants for legal malpractice. The complaint alleged Britt "should have … both the motion judge and trial judge erred because her malpractice claim did not begin to accrue until the sale …
-
A-3427-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… informed Plaintiffs counsel that no action for legal malpractice could be filed until the Plaintiffs suffered … Plaintiffs attempted to obtain counsel for a legal malpractice claim against the Defendant but were unable to … in the Plaintiffs filing a Complaint, pro se, for legal malpractice against the Defendant. In response to the filed …
njcourts.gov
… of counsel and on the brief). PER CURIAM This is a legal malpractice insurance coverage case. The parties disputed … misrepresented that there existed no potential legal malpractice claims, when in fact he knew otherwise. The … there was no insurance coverage for an underlying legal malpractice claim due to the misrepresentation. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… of counsel and on the brief). PER CURIAM This is a legal malpractice insurance coverage case. The parties disputed … misrepresented that there existed no potential legal malpractice claims, when in fact he knew otherwise. The … there was no insurance coverage for an underlying legal malpractice claim due to the misrepresentation. The …