Filters
- A-0868-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued December 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt, Moynihan and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the New Jersey Commissioner of Education, Docket No. 3-5/18A. Sanford R. … not the [ALJ]'s, to make the findings of fact and . . . the ultimate decision" in the case. N.J. Dep't of Pub. Advocate …
- A-0478-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… and STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Defendants, and THOMPSON REALTY COMPANY OF PRINCETON, INC., Defendant-Respondent. … Submitted January 29, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Enright. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … the recording of instruments affecting title, for the ultimate purpose of permitting purchasers to rely upon the …
- A-0540-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted November 14, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Whipple and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior … an emergent motion seeking, among other things, an order compelling the State to produce discovery. The motion judge … rendered him unable to call the informant as a witness and ultimately, deprived him of his constitutional right to …
- A-2098-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted January 7, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … an unmarked police SUV driven by Lieutenant Dave DeSane accompanied by Officer Eddy Raisin. They were on patrol in a … a reasonable likelihood that his or her claim will ultimately succeed on the merits." State v. Marshall, 148 …
- A-4298-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted March 25, 2019 – Decided April 12, 2019 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Rose. On appeal from Superior … . . . [D]efendant ignored several traffic signals and committed multiple motor vehicle violations. When . . . … disregard for her safety and the safety of others." Ultimately, the court determined the prosecutor's rejection …
- A-3310-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted January 10, 2019 – Decided April 8, 2019 Before Judges Whipple and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New … of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition Nos. 2007-31369 and 2009-2736. … agency decision with deference, and will not reverse the ultimate determination of an agency unless the court …
- A-3767-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… telephonically May 28, 2020 – Decided July 16, 2020 Before Judges Fuentes, Haas and Enright. On appeal from the … Exposition Authority [NJSEA] and the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission, "the two agencies with the common interest of … submitted with this application confirms the nature of the ultimate development contemplated by Dredge Management . . . …
- A-5962-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted May 28, 2020 – Decided June 23, 2020 Before Judges Suter and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New … to establish the type of services provided to her, the compensation she provided for those services, or that the … "some legally competent evidence must exist to support each ultimate finding of fact to an extent sufficient to provide …
- P-085-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY … (Law Offices of Cynthia A. Cappell, LLC, attorneys) for Plaintiff John Walsh, Jr., (Walsh & Walsh, Esqs., … before this court were the very facts that the Shinn court ultimately based its decision on. For instance, as …
- DC-10038-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Civil Action ORDER ILE DEC 2 4 THIS MATTER having come before this Comt by defendant, Wahid Elnashfan, Pro Se … account of the factual determinations in this case. Ultimately, Defendant has failed to persuade the Comi that …
- L-002822-16 Opinionnjcourts.gov… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MIDDLESEX … INC., JASON CYTRYN, and REBECCA MCCULLOUGH, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION April 2, 2019 COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS 2 Third … of the 2000 amendment, 10 R. 4:19 and R. 4:10-3 place the ultimate burden of persuasion on the objecting party to …
- A-1173-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted January 31, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior … September 4, 2015 [o]rder is hereby DENIED, for failure to comply with [R.] 4:49-2. Plaintiff did not timely file his … is not done, a reviewing court does not know whether the ultimate decision is based on the facts and law or is the …
- A-5511-14T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted January 10, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Guadagno. On appeal from the … the front door, at which point the troopers heard a voice coming from the deck on the side of the house ask, "Can I … of one or some of the factors is not conclusive of the ultimate determination of whether the right has been …
- A-0957-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted April 5, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Lisa. On appeal from Superior Court … hearing, Judge Charles Middlesworth, Jr. issued a comprehensive Memorandum of Decision on September 11, 2009, … demonstrate a reasonable likelihood that he or she will ultimately succeed on the merits. State v. Marshall, 148 …
- A-0492-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… ESQ., ATTORNEY AT LAW, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, Defendant-Respondent, and SUBURBAN … a written decision. In its written decision, the court ultimately found Hartford's May 31, 2011 letter "sufficient …
- A-2910-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted February 27, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Haas. On appeal from Superior Court … appeals from an order of summary judgment dismissing her complaint. Her complaint alleged defendant Stella Gardens … discrimination, plaintiff appealed, and plaintiff ultimately filed the action now before us. 6 A-2910-15T4 In …
- A-0185-14T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued December 14, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli, Rothstadt and Gooden Brown. On appeal … and dismissing counts one through three of his four- count complaint.1 We reverse. Quiroga and Cibelli began a romantic … what was going on[,] that [she] was going to regret it." Ultimately, the Family Part judge denied Quiroga the FRO and …
- A-1125-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Defendant-Appellant. Submitted January 22, 2018 - Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Rose. On appeal from Superior Court … 2015. The probation officer did not reference defendant's computerized criminal history ("CCH") that also includes a … not substitute our judgment for that of the prosecutor in ultimately determining whether to admit defendant into the …
- A-1147-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted December 19, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Gilson and Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court … defendant to have no contact with the victim, and to comply with Megan's Law restrictions. Defendant appeals his … prompted by comments in [defense counsel's] summation"). Ultimately, "it was for the jury to decide whether to draw …
- A-4674-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted November 9, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Currier. On appeal from Superior … witnesses identified the individuals, and an apartment complex surveillance camera captured the events that … a reasonable likelihood that his or her claim . . . will ultimately succeed on the merits." R. 3:22-10(b). However, …