njcourts.gov
… 47:1A-11 to impose civil penalties for knowing and willful violations of OPRA, and whether the court erred in denying … motion. The court's failure to consider defendant's clear violations of the order was without any explanation, and …
njcourts.gov
… Defendants assert that Plaintiffs cannot rely on alleged violations of the Anti-Bullying Act because the plain …
-
njcourts.gov
… both parties together "conspired, urged[,] and assisted in violations of the IFPA[,]" under the authority of Banco … and the Attorney General to bring a criminal action, for violations of the law. N.J.S.A. 17:33A-8. As a remedial …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1425-20 N.G., Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. R.T., Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent. _______________________ Argued January 10, 2022 – Decided February 28, 2022 …
-
njcourts.gov
EXPLANATION – Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in the above bill is not enacted and is intended to be omitted in the law. Matter underlined thus is new matter. Matter enclosed in superscript numerals has been adopted as follows: 1Assembly …
-
njcourts.gov
… 47:1A-11 to impose civil penalties for knowing and willful violations of OPRA, and whether the court erred in denying … motion. The court's failure to consider defendant's clear violations of the order was without any explanation, and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Packingham's pronouncement. The bottom line is that R.K.'s violations of an unconstitutional CSL condition have …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendants assert that Plaintiffs cannot rely on alleged violations of the Anti-Bullying Act because the plain …
-
njcourts.gov
… STATEMENT PRIOR TO HIS TRIAL CONSTITUTES GIGLIO AND JENCKS VIOLATIONS. i. THE FAILURE TO PRODUCE TORRES'[S] SWORN …
-
njcourts.gov
… Office (MCFMO) issued defendant Uniform Fire Code (UFC)2 violations for the building. When inspecting the building, an assistant fire marshal found ten UFC violations, including seven related to the adequacy, … performance of the "[f]ire protection [s]ystem" and three violations related to the obstructed means of egress and …
njcourts.gov
… THE ARBITRATION DECISION AND AWARD CONTAIN[S] STATUTORY VIOLATIONS AND ERRORS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AND/OR …
-
njcourts.gov
… THE ARBITRATION DECISION AND AWARD CONTAIN[S] STATUTORY VIOLATIONS AND ERRORS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AND/OR …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4621-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANDREW J. CONTALDI, Defendant-Appellant. Argued November 26, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Rose. On appeal from Superior Court …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0933-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEITH HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Submitted February 12, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino, Ostrer and …
njcourts.gov
… asserting knowing omissions, and claims based on regulatory violations." Bosland, supra, 197 N.J. at 556 (citing Cox v. … because 'the regulations impose strict liability for such violations.'" Ibid. (quoting Cox, supra, 138 N.J. at 18). … provisions may declare practices unlawful, thereby defining violations that can satisfy the first element A-3098-10T2 16 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4621-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANDREW J. CONTALDI, Defendant-Appellant. Argued November 26, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Rose. On appeal from Superior Court …
-
njcourts.gov
… asserting knowing omissions, and claims based on regulatory violations." Bosland, supra, 197 N.J. at 556 (citing Cox v. … because 'the regulations impose strict liability for such violations.'" Ibid. (quoting Cox, supra, 138 N.J. at 18). … provisions may declare practices unlawful, thereby defining violations that can satisfy the first element A-3098-10T2 16 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0933-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEITH HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Submitted February 12, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino, Ostrer and …
njcourts.gov
… judgment. The judge found plaintiff's "alleged FDCPA violations . . . were meritless and unsupported." The judge … to collect outstanding judgments, amounts to harassment or violations of the FDCPA. On appeal, plaintiff contends the … collect outstanding judgments, amount[ed] to harassment or violations of the FDCPA." We are cognizant of the general …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1602-21 IN THE MATTER OF MALIKAH SPENCER, ESSEX COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ____________________________ Argued April 25, 2023 – Decided May 2, 2023 Before Judges Geiger and Susswein. On …