-
njcourts.gov
… with New Jersey statutes, Administrative Code, and court decisions, the standard for parole where the committed … at parole hearings; adult inmates," states: (a) Parole decisions shall be based on the aggregate of all pertinent …
njcourts.gov
… his petition. II. A. "[A]n appellate court reviews agency decisions under an arbitrary and capricious standard." …
njcourts.gov
… (App. Div. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). Board decisions are "accorded a strong presumption of …
njcourts.gov
… We add the following comments. Our review of final decisions of the Board is limited. Malacow v. N.J. Dep't of …
njcourts.gov
… made incorrect determinations of fact. II. "[The Board's] decisions are afforded a deferential standard of review and …
njcourts.gov
… presumption of reasonableness attaches to final agency decisions. In re Carroll, 339 N.J. Super. 429, 437 (App. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3624-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TRACEY A. HUSARENKO, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ Submitted May 21, 2018 – Decided June 12, 2018 Before Judges Rose …
njcourts.gov
… defendant failed to provide any basis to reconsider its decisions on such arguments. See R. 4:49-2. The court … THEREFORE THIS COMPLAINT MUST BE DISMISSED. Here, the only decisions subject to challenge are those the court made when … the sheriff's sale and to vacate the final judgment. Those decisions are: (1) declining to reconsider any argument …
-
njcourts.gov
… defendant failed to provide any basis to reconsider its decisions on such arguments. See R. 4:49-2. The court … THEREFORE THIS COMPLAINT MUST BE DISMISSED. Here, the only decisions subject to challenge are those the court made when … the sheriff's sale and to vacate the final judgment. Those decisions are: (1) declining to reconsider any argument …
-
njcourts.gov
… presumption of reasonableness attaches to final agency decisions. In re Carroll, 339 N.J. Super. 429, 437 (App. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3624-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TRACEY A. HUSARENKO, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ Submitted May 21, 2018 – Decided June 12, 2018 Before Judges Rose …
-
njcourts.gov
… made incorrect determinations of fact. II. "[The Board's] decisions are afforded a deferential standard of review and …
-
njcourts.gov
… We add the following comments. Our review of final decisions of the Board is limited. Malacow v. N.J. Dep't of …
-
njcourts.gov
… (App. Div. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). Board decisions are "accorded a strong presumption of …
-
njcourts.gov
… his petition. II. A. "[A]n appellate court reviews agency decisions under an arbitrary and capricious standard." …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Keith …
njcourts.gov
… him with the State's cumulative file of Graves Act waiver decisions. Because defendant failed to establish the State's … State to turn over its cumulative file of Graves Act waiver decisions. In support of his motion, defendant included a … access to the State's cumulative file of Graves Act waiver decisions. We subsequently granted defendant's motion for …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1151-23 IN THE MATTERS OF WATCHUNG HILLS REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Charging Party/Cross Respondent-Appellant, and WATCHUNG HILLS REGIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0287-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MALCOLM A. BRADLEY, a/k/a HOOP BRADLEY, MALCOLM H. BRADLEY, and MALCOM BRADLEY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Keith …