Filters
- A-3737-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … also stated that if plaintiff had asked for help, he "would have reacted, stopped the bus. I would have intervened." … under N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 does not apply. Public entities and employees are also "not liable for an injury caused by [the] …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4459-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … distribution of cocaine within one thousand feet of school property, N.J.S.A. 3 A-4459-17T3 2C:35-7(a) (count … of counsel at other proceedings for which transcripts have been provided and the trial court's findings, which the …
- njcourts.gov… In the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) Montclair State University v. County … develop the record further. MSU appealed. The Appellate Division panel concluded that the trial court “mistakenly … of the community (specifically the need to build more schools) could be considered “a legitimate local interest …
- A-4459-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4459-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … distribution of cocaine within one thousand feet of school property, N.J.S.A. 3 A-4459-17T3 2C:35-7(a) (count … of counsel at other proceedings for which transcripts have been provided and the trial court's findings, which the …
- A-16-17 Opinionnjcourts.gov… In the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) Montclair State University v. County … develop the record further. MSU appealed. The Appellate Division panel concluded that the trial court “mistakenly … of the community (specifically the need to build more schools) could be considered “a legitimate local interest …
- HEATHER GENSINGER VS. IRIS REYES, ET AL. (L-0125-16, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2701-18T2 HEATHER GENSINGER, … Moyer- Jopp. Moyer-Jopp told Gensinger that she would have to submit overtime hours each week to the corporate … v. Dawson, 969 F.2d 1454, 1464 (3d Cir. 1992). Courts have reasoned that a falsely-charged defendant has other …
- A-2701-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2701-18T2 HEATHER GENSINGER, … Moyer- Jopp. Moyer-Jopp told Gensinger that she would have to submit overtime hours each week to the corporate … v. Dawson, 969 F.2d 1454, 1464 (3d Cir. 1992). Courts have reasoned that a falsely-charged defendant has other …
- MAXIM BASCH VS. BOARD OF REVIEW, ET AL. (BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3390-16T3 MAXIM BASCH, … between May 6, 2016 and July 8, 2016 because he did not have requalifying wages, nor was he unemployed, because … an S corporation "only for legal and tax purposes," has no employees and sporadic income, which qualify him for …
- FV-02-1094-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY BERGEN COUNTY CHANCERY DIVISION, FAMILY PART DOCKET NO. FV-02-1094-19 E.S., … economic relationship. Plaintiff 1 The parties’ initials have been used to protect their privacy. R. 1:38- 3(d)(10). … act after defendant left the household that would have given cause for any exacerbation of defendant’s …
- A-3390-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3390-16T3 MAXIM BASCH, … between May 6, 2016 and July 8, 2016 because he did not have requalifying wages, nor was he unemployed, because … an S corporation "only for legal and tax purposes," has no employees and sporadic income, which qualify him for …
- Skala v Johnson & Johnson - Order and MOD Denying Summary Judgment Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… standard, namely whether a plaintiff '''knew or should have known' of sufficient facts to start the statute of … conduct may have caused or contributed to the cause of the injury and that the conduct itself might possibly have been unreasonable or lacking in due care." …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2076-16T3 JUAN G. CALDAS, … Nugent. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L- 1322-15. Law Office of … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- A-2076-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2076-16T3 JUAN G. CALDAS, … Nugent. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L- 1322-15. Law Office of … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1528-23 BREIA RENNER, … had not accessed ProPhoenix recently and thought she would have to reset her password. As they walked to Garbarino's … argument she should not be disciplined because other GCPO employees accessed the database for personal reasons. The …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1528-23 BREIA RENNER, … had not accessed ProPhoenix recently and thought she would have to reset her password. As they walked to Garbarino's … argument she should not be disciplined because other GCPO employees accessed the database for personal reasons. The …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1505-23 RAYMOND MANZO, … for taking a short leave of absence that he claimed should have been granted as a reasonable accommodation. The court … order following entry of a final order. We further note we have not made any dispositive determinations as to the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1505-23 RAYMOND MANZO, … for taking a short leave of absence that he claimed should have been granted as a reasonable accommodation. The court … order following entry of a final order. We further note we have not made any dispositive determinations as to the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4242-18T2 WILLIAM MARK SCOTT, Appellant, … of persons, none of which is applicable to HCFFA and its employees. Before the GRC, the HCFFA custodian compiled a … & Family Servs. v. M.C. III, 201 N.J. 328, 339 (2010) ("We have often stated that issues not raised below will …
- A-4242-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4242-18T2 WILLIAM MARK SCOTT, Appellant, … of persons, none of which is applicable to HCFFA and its employees. Before the GRC, the HCFFA custodian compiled a … & Family Servs. v. M.C. III, 201 N.J. 328, 339 (2010) ("We have often stated that issues not raised below will …
- njcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … was enacted, PTI did not exist and therefore could not have been included within the statute's scope. If the … enabling an officer to collect back pay, it could have readily amended the statute. We will not construe the …