-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2657-15 LATASHA WALKER- HARRISON, … capricious. I. The facts underlying appellant's wrongdoing have already been detailed in our unpublished opinion … and harmful nature because the contraband cell phone could have been used in an escape attempt, to attack or threaten a …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0894-22 IN THE MATTER OF LANCE BENNETTE, … for reimbursement. In July, the NJDOT's routine audit of employees' driving privileges revealed Bennette's … the agency reached a conclusion "that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors." …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0894-22 IN THE MATTER OF LANCE BENNETTE, … for reimbursement. In July, the NJDOT's routine audit of employees' driving privileges revealed Bennette's … the agency reached a conclusion "that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors." …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4177-19 IN THE MATTER OF VICTOR VAZQUEZ, … after appellant and several other officers were found to have violated several administrative and department rules … contends the City violated ethics laws because two of its employees that charged him had conflicts of interest. A. We …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4177-19 IN THE MATTER OF VICTOR VAZQUEZ, … after appellant and several other officers were found to have violated several administrative and department rules … contends the City violated ethics laws because two of its employees that charged him had conflicts of interest. A. We …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1736-15T2 JPRC, INC. t/a LIQUID ASSETS, … place of business1 during the years 2002 through 2005 were employees, within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(1)(A), … that prior to 2003, petitioner treated the dancers as employees. In response to our question at oral argument, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1736-15T2 JPRC, INC. t/a LIQUID ASSETS, … place of business1 during the years 2002 through 2005 were employees, within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(1)(A), … that prior to 2003, petitioner treated the dancers as employees. In response to our question at oral argument, …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2750-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … restaurant's kitchen was closed, but they remained there to have some alcoholic beverages. At about 1:30 a.m., defendant … to four months prior to trial that defendant's automobile insurance carrier had retained an accident reconstruction …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0909-17T2 AMELIA MANYA EMILY ORT, … (husband's) testimony was not credible . . . . We have considered [d]efendant's efforts in subverting our … (3) the removal of his obligation to maintain life insurance; (4) an accounting from plaintiff of the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1580-18T1 NIDIA J. RIVERA, … 18. Nidia J. Rivera, appellant pro se. Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION … chihuahua. Rivera and Canseo reached an oral agreement to have their dogs mate. Rivera was to obtain puppies from the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0909-17T2 AMELIA MANYA EMILY ORT, … (husband's) testimony was not credible . . . . We have considered [d]efendant's efforts in subverting our … (3) the removal of his obligation to maintain life insurance; (4) an accounting from plaintiff of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2750-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … restaurant's kitchen was closed, but they remained there to have some alcoholic beverages. At about 1:30 a.m., defendant … to four months prior to trial that defendant's automobile insurance carrier had retained an accident reconstruction …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1580-18T1 NIDIA J. RIVERA, … 18. Nidia J. Rivera, appellant pro se. Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION … chihuahua. Rivera and Canseo reached an oral agreement to have their dogs mate. Rivera was to obtain puppies from the …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3868-19 GERARDO NODA, JR., … [our] own judgment for the agency's, even though [we] might have reached a different result." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. 8 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3868-19 GERARDO NODA, JR., … [our] own judgment for the agency's, even though [we] might have reached a different result." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. 8 …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3187-20 SANS AMERICA, INC., … work orders and, in response, Sans America provided two employees for an anticipated twelve-month period. Four … and whatever "secret, unexpressed intent" AMGO might have possessed cannot contradict the plain meaning of their …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3187-20 SANS AMERICA, INC., … work orders and, in response, Sans America provided two employees for an anticipated twelve-month period. Four … and whatever "secret, unexpressed intent" AMGO might have possessed cannot contradict the plain meaning of their …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1149-15T2 IN RE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT … of reasons. He said that the law "reject[s] the notion that employees of private security firms have a 'preferred right' to a permit to carry because of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1149-15T2 IN RE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT … of reasons. He said that the law "reject[s] the notion that employees of private security firms have a 'preferred right' to a permit to carry because of …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5304-17T1 PATEL GROUP, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Docket No. L-1178-16. Thomas D. … (1966), and Hobart Brothers Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company, 354 N.J. Super. 229 (App. Div. 2002). The …