Filters
- A-2133-19T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2133-19T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … evidence to establish all four prongs necessary for termination under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The father has not … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." N.J. Div. of Youth & Family …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0928-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division of Child Protection and Permanency (Division) in support of termination. We affirm. On March 16, 2020, the Division …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0928-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division of Child Protection and Permanency (Division) in support of termination. We affirm. On March 16, 2020, the Division …
- njcourts.gov… Finney & Rubenstein PC, attorneys for amicus curiae Child U.S.A. (John Baldante, of counsel and on the brief). … The judge also found "the common law discovery rule . . . support[ed] dismissal of [Doe's] claims," A-2780-21 8 … govern this appeal. We review de novo "the trial court's determination of the motion A-2780-21 11 to dismiss under Rule …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3934-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 30:4C- 15.1(c). The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. We affirm substantially for the … S.A.'s husband, E.A., Sr. (E.A.), does not appeal from the termination of his rights. Therefore, we use "defendant" to …
- A-3934-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3934-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 30:4C- 15.1(c). The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. We affirm substantially for the … S.A.'s husband, E.A., Sr. (E.A.), does not appeal from the termination of his rights. Therefore, we use "defendant" to …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2988-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- A-2988-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2988-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4613-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … Findings by a family court are "binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence." Id. …
- A-4613-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4613-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … Findings by a family court are "binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence." Id. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4594-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division proved by clear and convincing evidence that the termination of parental rights would not do more harm than … a trial judge's factual findings so long as they are supported by substantial credible evidence. R.G., 217 N.J. …
- A-4594-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4594-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division proved by clear and convincing evidence that the termination of parental rights would not do more harm than … a trial judge's factual findings so long as they are supported by substantial credible evidence. R.G., 217 N.J. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4693-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supported termination before the trial court and, on appeal, joins the …
- A-4693-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4693-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supported termination before the trial court and, on appeal, joins the …
- ELENA KLYACHMAN VS. MICHAEL J. GARRITY(FM-02-1642-12, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… in October 1999 and divorced on July 24, 2012. They had one child, a girl born in 2003 who will be fourteen years old in … motion in the Family Part seeking to terminate his alimony support obligation under Article III, Subsection 3.3(d) of … Article III, subsection 3.3(d) of the PSA provides for the termination of alimony if defendant shows plaintiff …
- A-0441-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… in October 1999 and divorced on July 24, 2012. They had one child, a girl born in 2003 who will be fourteen years old in … motion in the Family Part seeking to terminate his alimony support obligation under Article III, Subsection 3.3(d) of … Article III, subsection 3.3(d) of the PSA provides for the termination of alimony if defendant shows plaintiff …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2354-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … August 2013.2 According to defendant, he did not have the support of his family. His parents were deceased and he did … 14, 2014, the Family Part rejected the Division's plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption. The …
- A-2354-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2354-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … August 2013.2 According to defendant, he did not have the support of his family. His parents were deceased and he did … 14, 2014, the Family Part rejected the Division's plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption. The …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2977-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … DEMONSTRATED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION OF AMANDA'[S] PARENTAL RIGHTS WILL NOT DO MORE … we are bound by her factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient credible evidence, N.J. Div. of …
- A-2977-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2977-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … DEMONSTRATED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION OF AMANDA'[S] PARENTAL RIGHTS WILL NOT DO MORE … we are bound by her factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient credible evidence, N.J. Div. of …