njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4684-14T3 TIMOTHY CLARKE, … may not overturn an agency decision merely because we would have come to a different conclusion. Ibid. "However, we are … State v. Atley, 157 N.J. Super. 157, 163 (1978)) (We have "no capacity to review at all unless there is some kind …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0914-19T1 BRUCE AMPOLSKY, … He then filed his first- amended complaint adding employees of AEA as additional parties. Defendants responded … to nitrous oxide, and that defendants "knew or should have known that providing and/or administering nitrous oxide …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1016-18T2 IN THE MATTER OF C.E., POLICE … [our] own judgment for the agency's, even though [we] might have reached a different result." Stallworth, 208 N.J. at … noted that while the evaluators found the candidate to have below- average potential because, in part, they …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2093-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … BE DISMISSED BECAUSE THE ITEMS WERE NOT ACTUALLY STOLEN. We have reviewed these arguments in light of the record and … defendant. For example, in one text, the informant stated, "Haven't worked in so long I'm so broke! I know a sweet spot …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4684-14T3 TIMOTHY CLARKE, … may not overturn an agency decision merely because we would have come to a different conclusion. Ibid. "However, we are … State v. Atley, 157 N.J. Super. 157, 163 (1978)) (We have "no capacity to review at all unless there is some kind …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0344-16T3 DAWN THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Respondent-Respondent. … history given to an examining doctor. 5 A-0344-16T3 could have leaked from the patient's catheter bag. Garate also …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5083-16T4 ALEXIS M. ATWOOD, … on occasion a member advised the director he or she did not have a ride. In response, the director sent out an email to … does not earn any income for its performances. It has no employees; its director and staff are part-time volunteers. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4302-18T3 IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY … City's officers opined that 8 A-4302-18T3 Villanueva should have let the situation deescalate and under no circumstances … Q.S. to cause harm to Officer Villanueva, other detainees, employees of the facility, or any reason to believe that he …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4302-18T3 IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY … City's officers opined that 8 A-4302-18T3 Villanueva should have let the situation deescalate and under no circumstances … Q.S. to cause harm to Officer Villanueva, other detainees, employees of the facility, or any reason to believe that he …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1953-15T3 KATHRYN ROBINSON, … for two reasons: first, First Energy did not, but should have, filed an appeal or cross-appeal when petitioner … The triggering event was her encounter with two other employees as she drove onto First Energy's employee parking …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4331-15T1 ELIZABETH C. DECARLO, … replaced. It was . . . never fixed correctly. They should have had a piece of wood in there." 3 A-4331-15T1 Plaintiff … and a video depicting the unattached bar. Defendant's employees testified that numerous individuals frequently …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1953-15T3 KATHRYN ROBINSON, … for two reasons: first, First Energy did not, but should have, filed an appeal or cross-appeal when petitioner … The triggering event was her encounter with two other employees as she drove onto First Energy's employee parking …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4331-15T1 ELIZABETH C. DECARLO, … replaced. It was . . . never fixed correctly. They should have had a piece of wood in there." 3 A-4331-15T1 Plaintiff … and a video depicting the unattached bar. Defendant's employees testified that numerous individuals frequently …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2966-16T1 MICHAEL NOWICKI, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2966-16T1 MICHAEL NOWICKI, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2336-15T2 BELINDA DODSON, … Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. … Mayer. On appeal from the Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System, Department of Treasury. Samuel …
njcourts.gov
… ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION EQUITY PART GENERAL EQUITY PART BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET … it would not imply a “per day” reading of the provision. The phrase which states that “except that no less … to modify the prior language. The initial part of the provision clearly limits the number of authorized …
-
njcourts.gov
… ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION EQUITY PART GENERAL EQUITY PART BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET … it would not imply a “per day” reading of the provision. The phrase which states that “except that no less … to modify the prior language. The initial part of the provision clearly limits the number of authorized …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5361-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … proceeded to walk across the parking lot where four store employees stopped her, wrested the cart away from her, and … and then "stopped [defendant] and asked her if [he] could have her receipt[ t]o check to make sure she paid for the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5697-16T4 JEFF RANDALL, Appellant, v. … Benefit Appeals WILL NOT INITIATE A CALL TO YOU UNLESS YOU HAVE REGISTERED FOR THE HEARING AS INSTRUCTED ABOVE. So, … On appeal, claimant argues: [POINT I] [CLAIMANT] SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DENIED BENEFITS INITIALLY BECAUSE OF LIES TOLD BY …