Filters
- A-5542-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5542-17T4 NIKKI CORDERO, … Firko. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. L-0641-18. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ROBERTO BURGOS (14-09-1449, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1259-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … two); third-degree distributing or dispensing CDS in a school zone, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7 (count three); and … records. Defendant claimed his cellphone records should have been obtained to disprove that he spoke to co-defendant …
- A-1259-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1259-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … two); third-degree distributing or dispensing CDS in a school zone, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7 (count three); and … records. Defendant claimed his cellphone records should have been obtained to disprove that he spoke to co-defendant …
- Sae Power v. Avaya - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… CORPORATION, Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ESSEX COUNTY Docket No. L-001136/11 ORDER DENYING … and SAE Power Company (collectively, “SAE”). Both parties have also submitted motions in limine as to aspects of … the reduced CL worked! His inferences are incorrect and may have been based on Delta’s evaluation of our unit (not …
- njcourts.gov… CORPORATION, Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ESSEX COUNTY Docket No. L-001136/11 ORDER DENYING … and SAE Power Company (collectively, “SAE”). Both parties have also submitted motions in limine as to aspects of … the reduced CL worked! His inferences are incorrect and may have been based on Delta’s evaluation of our unit (not …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5174-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … daughter knew one of defendant's daughters from school. On March 19, 2011, defendant and his children … testified it was then that defendant offered her $500 to have sex with her daughter. J.R. left defendant's car and …
- A-5174-14T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5174-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … daughter knew one of defendant's daughters from school. On March 19, 2011, defendant and his children … testified it was then that defendant offered her $500 to have sex with her daughter. J.R. left defendant's car and …
- JANET DIXON VS. HC EQUITIES ASSOCIATES, LP (L-7755-16, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5756-17T1 JANET DIXON, … failed to consider material factual disputes that should have precluded summary judgment in favor of defendant. We … that he would at least attempt something . . . . [The employees] only have one way to enter and exit the building. …
- A-5756-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5756-17T1 JANET DIXON, … failed to consider material factual disputes that should have precluded summary judgment in favor of defendant. We … that he would at least attempt something . . . . [The employees] only have one way to enter and exit the building. …
- LAVANT JONES VS. RITE AID, ET AL. (L-1965-18, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2637-21 LAVANT JONES, … free." 6 A-2637-21 Defendant presented the testimony of two employees, Janice White and Tyesha Freshwater. At the time … the verdict was a "surprise" and "in excess of what would have been expected [in that case]," she did not find that …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2637-21 LAVANT JONES, … free." 6 A-2637-21 Defendant presented the testimony of two employees, Janice White and Tyesha Freshwater. At the time … the verdict was a "surprise" and "in excess of what would have been expected [in that case]," she did not find that …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4433-16T2 JACQUELINE TERHUNE and KREGG … 5 As stated, the sidewalk on which plaintiff claims to have fallen is on Brennan's residential property; the … Commission planting program, or (b) work performed by City employees in the official discharge of their …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4786-18 IN THE MATTER OF ALEX NAVAS, … precise issue is whether the findings of the agency could have been reached on substantial credible evidence in the … the adequacy of disciplinary charges filed against public employees." Pepe v. Twp. of Springfield, 337 N.J. Super. 94, …
- A-4433-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4433-16T2 JACQUELINE TERHUNE and KREGG … 5 As stated, the sidewalk on which plaintiff claims to have fallen is on Brennan's residential property; the … Commission planting program, or (b) work performed by City employees in the official discharge of their …
- A-4786-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4786-18 IN THE MATTER OF ALEX NAVAS, … precise issue is whether the findings of the agency could have been reached on substantial credible evidence in the … the adequacy of disciplinary charges filed against public employees." Pepe v. Twp. of Springfield, 337 N.J. Super. 94, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3889-22 A-2406-23 IN THE MATTER OF … Observation . . . a. Inmates on suicide precautions who have not been placed in an isolated confinement setting . . … the camera at 1:46 a.m., and therefore, Howard could not have observed him via the surveillance cameras after that …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3889-22 A-2406-23 IN THE MATTER OF … Observation . . . a. Inmates on suicide precautions who have not been placed in an isolated confinement setting . . … the camera at 1:46 a.m., and therefore, Howard could not have observed him via the surveillance cameras after that …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4040-17T4 C.B., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Somerset County, Docket Nos. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3870-18T1 IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT … restaurant, in charge of interviewing and hiring teenage employees. His victims were employees of that restaurant. 1 … the time the defendants in G.H. were convicted, they would have been eligible for relief from lifetime registration …
- GREGORY GOOTEE VS. CITY OF JERSEY CITY (L-3603-17, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0890-21 GREGORY GOOTEE, … 286-87 (1998) (quoting N.J.S.A. 59:4- 1(a)). Defendant's employees testified they were unable to determine whether … that the public entity, in the exercise of due care, should have discovered the condition and its dangerous character." …