Recent Arguments Before the Supreme Court

Is the materiality standard for a claim that the prosecutor failed to disclose evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), the same as the materiality standard for a claim of newly discovered evidence under State v. Carter, 91 N.J. 86 (1982), and does defendant satisfy the Brady materiality standard in this matter?

Was defendant entitled to discovery related to the State’s use of facial recognition technology, see State v. Arteaga, 476 N.J. Super. 36 (App. Div. 2023)?

With respect to a “motor vehicle liability policy . . . that names a corporate or business entity as a named insured” under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f), what is the “maximum . . . underinsured motorist coverage available under the policy” that must be provided to “an individual employed by the corporate or business entity”; and are endorsements limiting underinsured motorist coverage to an amount less than the general third-party liability coverage limit under the same policy in violation of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f) or otherwise contrary to public policy?

With respect to a “motor vehicle liability policy . . . that names a corporate or business entity as a named insured” under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f), what is the “maximum uninsured . . . motorist coverage available under the policy” that must be provided to “an individual employed by the corporate or business entity”?