njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2872-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a remand for clarification because the custody-visitation determination was memorialized in this action and not the … CHILD TO BE REMOVED FROM THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. We find insufficient merit …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2872-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a remand for clarification because the custody-visitation determination was memorialized in this action and not the … CHILD TO BE REMOVED FROM THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. We find insufficient merit …
-
A-1995-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… THAT OBLIGATES COURTS TO LOOK AT PRECEDENTS IN THE DETERMINATION OF THEIR DECISIONS THE COURT DELIVERED AN UNFAIR … 21,2023 Pa1 Civil Action Order Modifying or Terminating Support Order Heretofore Entered, filed September 20,1986 … Pa77 Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion for Termination of Child Support sent December 29,2023 to the court as being …
njcourts.gov
… law, we affirm. Claimant was employed as a teacher in the childcare center of the Hackensack University Medical Center … months to three years. After her suspension and subsequent termination from HUMC, claimant submitted a claim for … Under these definitions, we are satisfied there was ample support for the Board's determination that claimant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… law, we affirm. Claimant was employed as a teacher in the childcare center of the Hackensack University Medical Center … months to three years. After her suspension and subsequent termination from HUMC, claimant submitted a claim for … Under these definitions, we are satisfied there was ample support for the Board's determination that claimant's …
njcourts.gov
… A-3770-16T1 A-2432-17T1 A-2434-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and from the subsequent November 6, 2019 3 A-3769-16T1 termination of their parental rights to those children, as … the higher Title Thirty "clear and convincing" standard if supported by the proofs, Judge Paganelli found the Division …
-
njcourts.gov
… A-3770-16T1 A-2432-17T1 A-2434-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and from the subsequent November 6, 2019 3 A-3769-16T1 termination of their parental rights to those children, as … the higher Title Thirty "clear and convincing" standard if supported by the proofs, Judge Paganelli found the Division …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3628-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … it would be the Division's burden, not Judith's, to prove a termination of parental rights. Judith confirmed she … that findings by the trial court are binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence." …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3628-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … it would be the Division's burden, not Judith's, to prove a termination of parental rights. Judith confirmed she … that findings by the trial court are binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence." …
njcourts.gov
… his motion to vacate a judgment entered against him for child support arrearages NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL … 154 N.J. 394, 413 (1998). "Discretionary 6 A-1995-23 determinations, supported by the record, are examined to …
-
njcourts.gov
… his motion to vacate a judgment entered against him for child support arrearages NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL … 154 N.J. 394, 413 (1998). "Discretionary 6 A-1995-23 determinations, supported by the record, are examined to …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1343-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the order was consistent with the law because it was supported by substantial independent credible evidence that … rights. In June 2017, as the case was progressing to a termination of parental rights hearing, Rina passed away. …
njcourts.gov
… is whether the court erred in finding the parties have children in common. Having considered the record and the … post-judgment litigation regarding their two minor children. Plaintiff alleged defendant, who was then S.S.'s … Bergen County. He relies on Rule 4:3-2 and Rule 5:7A(b) in support of the proposition venue in this matter should be …
default
… in 1993 and divorced in Colorado in 2002. Their oldest child was born in 1997 and attends an out-of-state Ivy NOT … The Colorado order that originally fixed defendant's support obligations was registered in New Jersey in 2007; … the December 15, 2017 order that memorialized those determinations, arguing, among other things, that his child …
-
njcourts.gov
… in 1993 and divorced in Colorado in 2002. Their oldest child was born in 1997 and attends an out-of-state Ivy NOT … The Colorado order that originally fixed defendant's support obligations was registered in New Jersey in 2007; … the December 15, 2017 order that memorialized those determinations, arguing, among other things, that his child …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2405-15T4 A-2406-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … then nine years old, was dismissed by consent from the termination litigation and the parents were given more time … factors by clear and convincing evidence. The law guardian supports the judge's decision. After reviewing the record in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2405-15T4 A-2406-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … then nine years old, was dismissed by consent from the termination litigation and the parents were given more time … factors by clear and convincing evidence. The law guardian supports the judge's decision. After reviewing the record in …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3444-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Law Guardian contend the trial court's finding was not supported by substantial credible evidence. They maintain … court in determining whether to admit evidence, and that determination will be reversed only if it constitutes an abuse …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3444-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Law Guardian contend the trial court's finding was not supported by substantial credible evidence. They maintain … court in determining whether to admit evidence, and that determination will be reversed only if it constitutes an abuse …
njcourts.gov
… the issues on appeal. The parties were married in 1980. Two children were born of the marriage. The parties separated … ordered plaintiff to pay defendant $123 per week in child support.2 The court determined the standard of living the … the matter remanded for the court to make the appropriate determinations. Our disposition makes it unnecessary for us to …