njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1726-17T4 BRIAN DELANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRENT S. DICKEY and SILLS CUMMIS & GROSS, PC, Defendants-Respondents. Argued January 30, 2019 – Decided August 23, 2019 Before Judges Alvarez, …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0240-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DYLAN D. BARAZANJI, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Argued March 16, 2022 – Decided April 14, 2022 Before Judges Hoffman, …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5373-15T4 JOY SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. FIN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a New Jersey Limited Partnership, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, and UNITED …
njcourts.gov
… court concluded that, as a matter of law, Robert's ethics violations invalidated the lease agreement and accompanying … reflects New Jersey's strong public policy against ethical violations by attorneys. Our Supreme Court has long held …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0853-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BRIAN CARTER, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________________________ Argued December 13, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Messano, …
njcourts.gov
… defendant performed. Next, in reviewing the consumer fraud violations, the trial judge denied recovery, characterizing … no cause of action, finding the assertion of technical violations of the CFA were unaccompanied by a proved … here is that "[t]he question whether the regulatory violations [under the CFA] subject[s] defendant[] to treble …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0240-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DYLAN D. BARAZANJI, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Argued March 16, 2022 – Decided April 14, 2022 Before Judges Hoffman, …
-
njcourts.gov
… defendant performed. Next, in reviewing the consumer fraud violations, the trial judge denied recovery, characterizing … no cause of action, finding the assertion of technical violations of the CFA were unaccompanied by a proved … here is that "[t]he question whether the regulatory violations [under the CFA] subject[s] defendant[] to treble …
-
njcourts.gov
… As an adult, defendant has incurred three local ordinance violations and one disorderly persons conviction. Notably, …
-
njcourts.gov
… court concluded that, as a matter of law, Robert's ethics violations invalidated the lease agreement and accompanying … reflects New Jersey's strong public policy against ethical violations by attorneys. Our Supreme Court has long held …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1726-17T4 BRIAN DELANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRENT S. DICKEY and SILLS CUMMIS & GROSS, PC, Defendants-Respondents. Argued January 30, 2019 – Decided August 23, 2019 Before Judges Alvarez, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3173-16T3 IN THE MATTER OF LACEY TOWNSHIP CAFRA PERMIT. ___________________________ Argued December 10, 2018 – Decided April 26, 2019 Before Judges Sabatino and Haas. On appeal from the New …
-
njcourts.gov
… court's denial of its motion to dismiss complaints alleging violations of the Borough of Beach Haven's sign ordinance. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1981-17T3 MARY FOURTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CAPITAL, a foreign Limited Liability Company, Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Submitted December 6, 2018 – Decided March …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0853-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BRIAN CARTER, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________________________ Argued December 13, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Messano, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5373-15T4 JOY SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. FIN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a New Jersey Limited Partnership, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, and UNITED …
-
njcourts.gov
… intentional infliction of severe emotional distress; (4) violations of several paragraphs of Article I of the New Jersey Constitution; (5) violations of N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c); (6) state- created danger … Count Three. D. Count Four of the amended complaint alleged violations of plaintiff's rights under the New Jersey …
-
njcourts.gov
… DENIED DEFENDANT'S CLAIMS FOR RELIEF BASED ON BRADY VIOLATIONS. A. BRADY VIOLATION ONE – INCONSISTENT STATEMENT. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2563-22 CARL PETTY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARIA BASILE, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued April 30, 2024 – Decided May 30, 2024 Before Judges Mayer, Paganelli and …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1572-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. U.Y.A.,1 Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Submitted November 13, 2024 – Decided February 27, 2025 Before …