-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER - The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint and have not been verified for accuracy by the Tax … Co Bd Assessment: Tax Ct Judgment: Judgment type: Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Added/Omitted: Pro …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER - The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint and have not been verified for accuracy by the Tax … Co Bd Assessment: Tax Ct Judgment: Judgment type: Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Added/Omitted: Pro …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER - The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint and have not been verified for accuracy by the Tax … Co Bd Assessment: Tax Ct Judgment: Judgment type: Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Added/Omitted: Pro …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER - The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint and have not been verified for accuracy by the Tax … Co Bd Assessment: Tax Ct Judgment: Judgment type: Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Added/Omitted: Pro …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER - The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint and have not been verified for accuracy by the Tax … Co Bd Assessment: Tax Ct Judgment: Judgment type: Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Added/Omitted: Pro …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER: The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint. These figures have not been verified for accuracy … Judgment Date: Judgment Type: 4/26/2023 Complaint Withdrawn Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Interest: Credit …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER: The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint. These figures have not been verified for accuracy … Date: Judgment Type: 8/3/2023 Dismissed without prejudice Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Interest: Credit …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER: The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint. These figures have not been verified for accuracy … Judgment Type: 6/13/2023 Settle - Reg Assess w/Figures Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Interest: Credit …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER: The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint. These figures have not been verified for accuracy … Judgment Date: Judgment Type: 2/28/2024 Complaint Withdrawn Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Interest: Credit …
njcourts.gov
… v. BERNARDO RIVERA, a/k/a BERNARDO ROACH, and JOSE TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. … Kevin Sturmfels, Anthony Flores, and Detective Sean Freeman were patrolling the area of Quentin Avenue in an … the occupants to put their hands on their laps and they complied. Freeman testified he did not look under the car …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 11, 2025 ‒ Decided March 5, 2026 Before Judges Bishop-Thompson and Puglisi. On appeal from an interlocutory order of the … order denying its motion to dismiss plaintiff Todd Jones's complaint for failure to comply with the Affidavit of Merit …
njcourts.gov
… ARDIST RIVERS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PATRICIA PERSON and FRANK J. PERSON, Defendants-Appellants. … Submitted January 26, 2026 – Decided March 3, 2026 Before Judges Sabatino and Bergman. On appeal from the … owned by them and plaintiff Ardist Rivers as tenants in common, appointed plaintiff as attorney in fact to list the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 22, 2026 – Decided February 23, 2026 Before Judges Vanek and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … defendant's PCR petition for the reasons set forth in his comprehensive oral opinion. The judge considered each of the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 27, 2025 – Decided April 1, 2025 Before Judges Natali and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from the Superior Court of … appeals from an August 14, 2023 order denying his motion to compel post-conviction discovery. We affirm. After defendant …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 23, 2025 - Decided October 8, 2025 Before Judges Perez Friscia and Vinci. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … hearing, Judge Christopher J. Romanyshyn issued an order accompanied by a cogent twenty-one-page written decision …
njcourts.gov
… v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK, Defendant-Respondent, and ASBURY PARK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, A-TECH CONCRETE COMPANY, and J.E. HENNING, INC., t/a BIRD CONSTRUCTION, … Argued November 20, 2025 – Decided January 6, 2026 Before Judges Mawla, Marczyk and Puglisi. On appeal from an …
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0439-24 ROBERT FREUND and JOANN FREUND, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOME DEPOT … cart, at which time he slipped and fell.. Plaintiff's complaint alleged he was injured after slipping in … stated he returned home after he fell due to pain and revisited the parking lot to investigate the next day. During …
njcourts.gov
… 19, 2025 – Decided December 2, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Vanek. On appeal from the New Jersey Commissioner of Education, Docket No. 221-7/24. Murphy … additional notice directly to Adeyin. Because the Board points to no disputed facts regarding its non- compliance …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 21, 2025 – Decided December 16, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Torregrossa- O'Connor. On appeal from the Superior Court … Plaintiff, a driver for defendant's medical transport company, alleged, when her employment with defendant …
njcourts.gov
… J. Duffy, Deputy Attorney General Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street PO Box 106 Trenton, New Jersey … Inc.’s (“Infosys”) motion for partial summary judgment and denying Director, Division of Taxation’s (“Director”) … was in error. In support of this contention, the Director points to page 17, footnote 4 of its summary judgment brief, …