-
njcourts.gov
… Resubmitted October 8, 2025 – Decided October 28, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Augostini. On appeal from the New … for unlawful purpose, and terroristic threats . Camilo committed these offenses in 1980. Initially, the judge … clauses, it is hereby overruled.") Camilo's offenses took place in 1980. Thus, the law governing review of his parole …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 28, 2023 – Decided February 14, 2024 Before Judges Smith and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the … apparently satisfied the parties were prepared to proceed, placed them under oath and commenced questioning the parties about their history, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 11, 2023 – Decided February 15, 2024 Before Judges Berdote Byrne and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal … and continued to manage and operate the Audubon Park community. Since 1974, Kelly Ann's father held a life estate … it would be inequitable to vacate the judgment and place defendants back in the home when plaintiff has secured …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 15, 2024 – Decided May 10, 2024 Before Judges Bishop-Thompson and Jacobs. On appeal from the … (DOC) finding her guilty and imposing discipline for committing a prohibited act: *.005, "threatening another … As we have long recognized, "[p]risons are dangerous places, and the courts must afford appropriate deference and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 29, 2025 – Decided August 20, 2025 Before Judges Bishop-Thompson and Augostini. On appeal from … 203 Hansbury, executed a promissory note for $873,750 and commercial mortgage agreement in favor of 203 Hansbury with … N.J. 328, 340 (2002) (holding that "[i]t is not the label placed on the action that is pivotal but the nature of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 11, 2025 – Decided July 9, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the … to show cause for temporary restraints and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. The trial court ruled there was … [d]efendant pointed out that no adverse action has taken place and the matter may still be resolved prior to any …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 28, 2025 – Decided July 10, 2025 Before Judges Sumners and Susswein. On appeal from the … restraint, N.J.S.A. 2C:13-2. The alleged offenses were committed against a seventeen-year-old victim. On September … registration requirements. Defendant's appeal was initially placed on our Sentencing Oral Argument calendar. See R. …
-
njcourts.gov
… motive evidence. Here, defendant is not making this request for preclusion pursuant to N.J.R.E. 404(b), but due to the … and those forged by the defendant to hide his thefts – and communications from the victim accusing the defendant of … Classifying testimony or evidence as “financial” does not place it outside the competence of the jury. “A witness …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 3, 2025 – Decided November 19, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino and Bergman. On appeal from New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2023-0631. Law Offices of Michael … the Cannabis Regulatory, Enforcement Assistance, and Marketplace Modernization Act 7 A-3148-23 ("CREAMMA"), the new …
-
njcourts.gov
… Employer Registration now includes clear instructions for deleting addresses no longer associated with a firm. For … 3 In all places the attorney name change form displays, it is now … 2) Confirm or Update Contact Information 3) CLE Compliance … for those attorneys whose Attorney Registration Status is 'Complete' and have opted for employer payment. If an …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 16, 2025 – Decided December 2, 2025 Before Judges Marczyk and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … order denying her order to show cause and dismissing her complaint against defendant Monmouth County Division of … show that there is a 'specific and unequivocal' order in place." Ibid. (quoting Abbott v. Burke, 170 N.J. 537, 565 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 19, 2025 – Decided March 4, 2026 Before Judges Mayer and Jacobs. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2024-2589. Michael A. Bukosky argued … per year. Due to a purported administrative error, NJSP placed Antenucci at a higher salary level than he was …
-
njcourts.gov
… the following attorneys to serve as Leadership Counsel for all Plaintiffs. CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS: Robert … Street Bel Air, MD 21014 850.805.7011 robe11@kbaattorneys.com -and- Edward B. Mulligan V, Esq. COHEN & MALAD, LLP One … the designated functions and reserves the discretion to replace these counsel should they become unable or unwilling …
njcourts.gov
… OPINION Petrillo, J.S.C. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion for … orders. Id. Nevertheless, the Court, while empowered to revisit its interlocutory rulings, should do so primarily to … 3 ("The events of the birth and neonatal re-suscitation are mostly absent and cause the greatest challenge to evaluate. …
njcourts.gov
… INSURANCE GROUP and/or NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. _________________________________ … of the evidence, but only with its existence, viewed most favorably to the party opposing the motion." Dolson v. … significant disfigurement or significant scarring; displaced fractures; loss of a fetus; or a permanent injury …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 11, 2025 – Decided March 31, 2025 Before Judges Gilson, Firko, and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal … analyze the required Rule 5:3-5(c) factors. I. This matter comes before us for a second time. The chronology is set … claims on this issue date back to May 2001, while the most recent proof of medical expenses she submitted is dated …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 15, 2025 – Decided April 8, 2025 Before Judges Currier and Marczyk. On appeal from the Superior … brief). 1 REM New Jersey, Inc. was improperly named in the complaint as "The Mentor Network." NOT FOR PUBLICATION … materials presented, when 10 A-0157-23 viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, are sufficient to …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … 15, 2019, the Estate filed a four-count medical malpractice complaint, which included survivorship claims.1 On April 1, … medical expenses. The Estate posits that because most of the Division's $214,391.95 lien is for decedent's …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 19, 2024 – Decided April 9, 2025 Before Judges Gilson, Bishop-Thompson, and Augostini. On … and the City (collectively, defendants) and dismissing its complaint. We affirm. I. We glean the facts from the summary judgment record, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the non-moving party. …
njcourts.gov
… established in the summary judgment record in the light most favorable to the HOA members, the non-moving parties. … Ibid. The DEP recognized in its 5 A-2438-24 condemnation complaint that the Association was the fee owner of the … review of the record demonstrates the DEP's argument is misplaced. We affirmed the second court's dismissal of the …