njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4064-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … According to the testifying officer, defendant "did not have any construction equipment with him [or] any … 4 A-4064-17T4 THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BECAUSE THE OFFICERS LACKED PROBABLE CAUSE …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0234-17T2 BRONWEN MELVIN, … engage in a reconsideration analysis. Defendant should have filed his motion to reconsider or amend the June 8, … that defendant is essentially challenging the FJOD – we have considered defendant's arguments on the merits and see …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3881-17T4 WILFREDO GONZALEZ, Appellant, … his due process rights, was ineffective, and should have requested a polygraph examination of the corrections … by appellant's argument that substitute counsel should have requested a polygraph examination of the correction …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4399-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of PCR, is anchored in arguments that, with one exception, have nothing to do with the reconsideration order itself: I. … The trial court erred when it determined that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the petition. 2 In the August …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5343-17T1 PATRICK PANTUSCO, Appellant, … HIS RIGHT TO COMPLETE HIS COLLEGE DEGREE. 3 A-5343-17T1 We have considered appellant's contentions in light of the … v. Rahway State Prison, 81 N.J. 571, 579-80 (1980)). We have consistently upheld the DOC's institutional prerogative …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1874-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … hearing, defendant argued the police officers did not have reasonable suspicion to stop the car because the … the police officers, the motion judge found the car did not have its headlights on when the officers first saw the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5517-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and certain persons previously convicted not permitted to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(b)(1). He was sentenced to … to prejudice the defendant's case."). Nor did the charge have the clear capacity to mislead the jury in these …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5346-17T1 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST … to make the payment due on January 1, 2014. Defendants have not made any payment since that date. Plaintiff filed a … in favor of plaintiff. In addition, defendants argue they have meritorious defenses to plaintiff's foreclosure action. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1147-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … at a hearing," other charges against a PTI applicant that have been dismissed "may not be considered for any purpose." … that the policy of "deterrence is directed at persons who have committed wrongful acts[,]" and the "sole fact" of an …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2191-17T3 ARCHIE M. HICKOX, Appellant, … release date is March 30, 2020. 3 A-2191-17T3 We have "a limited role in reviewing a decision of a state … omitted). Inmates in correctional facilities do not have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in a …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5802-17T2 DERRICK RUSSELL, Appellant, v. … charge was "duplicative" of the *.002 charge and should have been dismissed. The scope of our review of an agency … Program was subsumed within the assault charge and should have been dismissed. The DOC agreed with Russell's position …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1324-18T3 IN THE MATTER OF THE … the applicable law, we reverse. Frances1 and Shamarr have a son born in January 2013. Frances, the mother, gave … her family unit, and since her brothers did not intend to have children, Frances's child would be the last in the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3980-19T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Warren County, Accusation No. 06-01-0042. Joseph E. … not consider the State's argument that the matter should have been presented to the parole board rather than the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1406-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County, Indictment No. 15-06-0714. Joseph E. … his resentence is excessive, we disagree. Trial judges have broad sentencing discretion as long as the sentence is …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1414-18 ONN RAPEIKA, Appellant, v. NEW … imposing the sanction, the officer found appellant did not have any mental history or prior disciplinary history. … an officer "purely by accident" but alleged he "should not have been charged." On September 25, 2018, Assistant …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0024-20 VALERIE KONEFAL, … of plaintiff's arguments in this appeal could, and should, have been addressed in her original appeal. Nowhere in our … and a demand "describ[ing] the specific conduct alleged to have violated [Rule 1:4-8]." R. 1:4-8(b)(1). Here, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2829-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … jurisdiction and because police officers did not . . . have probable cause to arrest and search." On December 9, … filed pro se petition.'" He also contends that he did not have the opportunity to supplement his pro se arguments at …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3724-19 IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL CHASE, … and not supported by the evidence. We affirm. We have "a limited role" in reviewing agency decisions. Henry … it, or if the agency conclusion could not reasonably have been reached on a showing of the relevant factors. In …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0777-20 IN RE BOROUGH OF LEONIA … attempting to limit non-resident rush hour traffic have been invalidated by judicial decision. The ordinances … THE ORDINANCES, AS SUCH A DETERMINATION COULD NOT HAVE REASONABLY BEEN MADE UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE FINDINGS …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1465-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT N. SHAVER, III, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted May 10, 2022 – … Atlantic County, Indictment No. 06-09-2106. Robert N. Shaver, III, appellant pro se. Matthew J. Platkin, Acting …