-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2995-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the findings of the Law Division "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … 146, 162 (1964). We need make no further inquiry. Ibid. We have considered defendant's remaining arguments in light of …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1602-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Indictment No. 22-03-0370. Jennifer … hematoma" and opined that this injury was also unlikely to have been caused accidentally. On March 7, 2022, a grand …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0678-23 511 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINUM … in this matter" and asserted "a simple e[]mail would have sufficed." Defendant further contended his motion was … efficiency with the equitable notion that courts should have authority to avoid an unjust result in any given case." …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1995-23 CAROL SAYERS, … unexplained length of time . . . to do what in law should have been done." Lavin v. Hackensack Bd. of Educ., 90 N.J. … judgment in its November 17, 2023 order. For the reasons we have already set forth, the trial court's findings were …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2003-17T2 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND … I.S. took R.S. to her mother's, M.B.'s, home to visit and have dinner. Upon arriving at M.B.'s home, I.S. went into … DID NOT AND SHOULD NOT NOW BE PERMITTED TO DO SO WHEN THEY HAVE A FINDING THAT IS ADVERSE TO THEM, THIS IS GIVING THEM …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2487-16T2 LOUIS BADUINI and JOEL … of PSE&G at the property. At one time, the property may have been considered wetlands, but it had been drained and … Super. 210, 234-35 (App. Div. 2008) (citation omitted). We have long recognized that "because of their peculiar …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2635-18T3 S.S., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … threaten the plaintiff; and (3) a reasonable person would have believed the threat." Cesare, 154 N.J. at 402. Here, we … to disturb the award of counsel fees. To the extent we have not addressed defendant's remaining arguments, we find …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5005-15T3 JASON MCGEE, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Ocean County, Docket No. C-000025-14. Darryl T. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0378-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … transaction. The judge held that the police did not have a "specific and articulable set of facts to rely upon … we conclude, as in Stovall and Zapata, the officer would have been derelict not to investigate the report of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5411-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … judge's] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … disturb the trial court's finding merely because 'it may have reached a different conclusion were it the trial …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5751-14T3 A-0192-15T4 STATE OF NEW … Gilson. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Indictment No. 07-09-0124. NOT FOR … was also convicted of second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7. Defendants were sentenced in …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0759-17T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … Brown. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. SVP- 075-00. Patrick … has been given a conditional discharge and is alleged to have violated it." E.D., 183 N.J. at 551. In either case, …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5443-17T3 M.N., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … acts should be considered 'regardless of whether those acts have been the subject of a domestic violence adjudication.'" … and legal conclusions are unassailable. To the extent we have not addressed H.N.'s remaining arguments, we find they …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0678-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and was the State's chief witness at trial. She claimed to have accepted the victim's invitation to meet for drinks. … his/her control thereof for a sufficient period of time to have been able to relinquish control if he/she chose to do …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1921-15T1 A-3586-15T1 STATE OF NEW … Lisa. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Indictment Nos. 14-01-0034 … Graves Act parole disqualifier which, for Kaczur, would have been three years pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6c, and to …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1447-23 L.G.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and lived together for three years. They do not have children together. According to plaintiff, on an … long since ended. They do not reside together and do not have children in common. There is no evidence in the record …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2816-23 ASAP REALTY, INC., … In our August 2022 order, we noted that "[b]oth parties have expended more fees than each side had originally … over $100,000.00 of the judgment in its favor. Those monies have been paid through wage garnishment and bank levies. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1884-22 M.P.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … protection. We affirm. I. The parties are married and have two minor children, K.P. and S.P. They lived … harassment. Ibid. (quoting H.E.S, 175 N.J. at 321). As we have previously addressed in the context of a domestic …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1146-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … court's "opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … on the record and entitled to our deference. Therefore, we have no reason to disturb his conclusion that the totality …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2170-23 NIPUN GUPTA, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Hudson County, Docket No. … direct appeal, as that is not before us. To the extent we have not addressed any of plaintiff's remaining arguments, …