njcourts.gov
… any law." This appeal followed. We review summary judgment decisions de novo using the same standard governing the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4036-18T3 KEVIN MALANGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE PLANNING BOARD, and TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE TOWNSHIP COUNCIL, Defendants-Respondents, and WEST …
njcourts.gov
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
njcourts.gov
… standard of review of the trial judge's evidentiary decisions, State v. Cole, 229 N.J. 430, 449 (2017), we …
njcourts.gov
… taken from orders and judgments and not from opinions, oral decisions, informal written decisions, or reasons given for the ultimate conclusion." …
njcourts.gov
… is only to point out 'the matters or controlling decisions which [a party] believes the court has overlooked …
njcourts.gov
… who addressed Farina's claims in their written and oral decisions that accompanied the orders under appeal. The … and Judge Mongiardo in their thorough written and oral decisions. We add only the following comments. The …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3136-23 K.M., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. G.M., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued September 22, 2025 – Decided October 7, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino and …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0888-23 ROBERT BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JENNIFER WEBB-MCRAE, HAROLD SHAPIRO, RICHARD NECELIS, and RONALD CUFF, individually and in their official capacities, and CUMBERLAND COUNTY, a New …
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2455-23 LINDSAY PALMISANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS and MUNICIPAL …
njcourts.gov
… contract claims could not survive in the face of these decisions and express language of the MSRA. Plaintiffs could … Although plaintiffs were correct that unpublished decisions are not binding, citing Sauter v. Colts Neck … not viable because the City's action was based on fiscal decisions made by the director to remedy the City's …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3121-23 A-3122-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KYREED PINKETT and DEJOHN PRESTON, Defendants-Respondents. __________________________ STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. …
-
njcourts.gov
(Sponsorship Updated As Of: 3/25/2021) [Third Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No. 5472 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 219th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MARCH 15, 2021 Sponsored by: Assemblyman HERB CONAWAY, JR. District 7 (Burlington) Assemblywoman JOANN DOWNEY District 11 (Monmouth) …
-
njcourts.gov
… were based upon legitimate, non-discriminatory business decisions. The judge stated: The Court finds that [the manager]'s decisions as to plaintiff were based on a two year history … brokerage accounts. And so, I find that those were business decisions. Moreover, even if the plaintiff was able to …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3571-19 DAVID JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued November 1, 2021 – Decided August …
-
njcourts.gov
… 242 N.J. 530, 548 (2020). A-4156-19 17 support in prior decisions. See State v. Boston, 469 N.J. Super. 223, 236 n.3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… and deposited in the accounts. Defendant challenges both decisions on appeal. "[T]he goal of equitable distribution . …
-
njcourts.gov
… principles apply to appellate review of administrative decisions involving "disputes arising under school laws." …
-
njcourts.gov
… of their judicial system, and the fairness of the court's decisions in a particular case. Although the potential for …
-
njcourts.gov
… and where’s there [is] [c]ourt oversight over the placement decisions made by [the Division]. The court stated, however, … arguments. III. We accord "great deference to discretionary decisions of Family Part judges[,]" Milne v. Goldenberg, 428 …