-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0824-18T4 MARCO SEMINARIO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Submitted February 5, 2020 – …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4178-19 IN THE MATTER OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, Respondent-Respondent, and AAUP – BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES OF NEW JERSEY, Respondent-Respondent, and ESTATE OF DR. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4316-18T2 IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Respondent/Cross-Appellant. Argued telephonically …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2163-16T1 A.F., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES and MORRIS COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondents-Respondents. …
-
njcourts.gov
… from orders entered by the Law Division affirming the decisions of defendant Planning Board of the City of … of the Law Division judge’s thorough and well- reasoned decisions, and our deferential standard of review, we … considered Judge Cassidy's thorough and well-reasoned decisions in light of the record and the controlling …
-
njcourts.gov
… Tpk. Auth., 137 N.J. 8, 27 (1994)). It is well settled that decisions of administrative agencies carry with them a …
-
njcourts.gov
… of aligned professional development, and inform personnel decisions[.]" N.J.S.A. 18A:6-118(a). In passing the Act, the … agencies] are privileged to disagree with our decisions, 'the privilege does not extend to …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2119-19 DASHAD WALDEN, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted March 17, 2021 – Decided April 15, 2021 Before Judges Accurso and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4382-17T4 DOROTHY MOORE, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and BERGEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LP, Respondents. __________________________ Submitted October 17, 2019 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… the above standards, we discern no reason to disturb the decisions of the trial court or the Board and affirm …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4178-19 IN THE MATTER OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, Respondent-Respondent, and AAUP – BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES OF NEW JERSEY, Respondent-Respondent, and ESTATE OF DR. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0071-23 MAGDOULEN A. SAWIRES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Defendants-Respondents. …
-
njcourts.gov
… not supported by substantial 2 Chisolm does not appeal the decisions regarding the *.306 and *.554 charges. 5 A-3098-20 …
default
… 2:11-3(e)(1). As the judge who rendered both Law Division decisions noted, reconsideration is governed by Rule 4:49-2. … Such motions must specify "the matters or controlling decisions which [the movant] believes the court has … 288 (App. Div. 2010) (citation omitted). We review those decisions to determine whether an abuse of discretion has …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1614-18T3 ZION'ELIYAH YAH'TORAH, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. Submitted May 12, 2020 – Decided May 26, 2020 Before Judges Accurso and Rose. On appeal from the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2352-22 CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEVEN RADA, EMR PROXY FLOORING CORP., and RICHARD KLEIN, Defendants-Respondents. ______________________________ Submitted December 18, 2024 – …
njcourts.gov
… in parole matters. Our standard of review of the Board's decisions is limited, and "grounded in strong public policy … Consequently, our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1614-18T3 ZION'ELIYAH YAH'TORAH, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. Submitted May 12, 2020 – Decided May 26, 2020 Before Judges Accurso and Rose. On appeal from the …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2:11-3(e)(1). As the judge who rendered both Law Division decisions noted, reconsideration is governed by Rule 4:49-2. … Such motions must specify "the matters or controlling decisions which [the movant] believes the court has … 288 (App. Div. 2010) (citation omitted). We review those decisions to determine whether an abuse of discretion has …
-
njcourts.gov
… in parole matters. Our standard of review of the Board's decisions is limited, and "grounded in strong public policy … Consequently, our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …